当前在线人数8982
首页 - 博客首页 - 天下兴亡,匹夫有责 - 文章阅读 [博客首页] [首页]
环保变暖教和EPA狼狈为奸
作者:awaydream
发表时间:2021-09-10
更新时间:2021-09-10
浏览:111次
评论:0篇
地址:152.
::: 栏目 :::
人口
农业粮食
经济
地区差异
军事
美利坚见闻

发信人: awaydream (昆仑天下), 信区: Military
标 题: Re: 为啥有的车起步时候有打火的声音?
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Sep 10 11:26:22 2021, 美东)

还要装2个电池, 一个大电池,一个小电池。
小电池很容易坏,2年就坏。小电池坏了,还会带着大电池坏,
而且火花塞更容易坏,还有一堆其他毛病,系统更复杂了,
更易出问题了。


省那点油钱完全不够后面的多的维护费用的消耗

MBA经理和傻逼EPA害死人不偿命。


发信人: awaydream (昆仑天下), 信区: Military
标 题: Re: 为啥有的车起步时候有打火的声音?
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Sep 10 11:51:00 2021, 美东)

主要是为了满足EPA的变态MPG要求

美国的EPA被民主党和变暖教渗透烂了,完全不要脸了。


对于车主来说,最有价值的数据是,车辆的全生命周期,
$/mile,就是开一个mile到底要多少钱。一年开10K mile到底
要出多少钱。

EPA的傻逼逼着搞变态的MPG,最后逼着上turbo (涡轮增压相比自然吸气
也会更早完蛋)。他只在意新车出厂,按他的标准测试的MPG,至于5年后车
是不是完蛋了,车主哭死了,他根本不管。

就拿电车来说,看起来MPG是很高, 因为丫的不烧油。但是,电从哪里来?
还不是得烧煤,烧天然气发电,还得输变电,还得搞大电池,大电池过几年
就完蛋。生产电池和处理废电池的污染比烧油还厉害。而且扣除掉补贴,
全生命周期(从买来到开报废),同档电车$/mile至少是油车的3倍以上。


这真是一个颠倒黑白,是非不分的垃圾时代。变暖教的洗脑和中世纪的教会,
一个垃圾样子,只有他的东西才是科学,不服就整你。





U.S. EPA shoots to push vehicle fuel efficiency to 52 mpg by
2026

https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-epa-proposes-
big-boost-
vehicle-emissions-stringency-through-2026-2021-08-05/


ASHINGTON, Aug 5 (Reuters) - President Joe Biden's
administration on
Thursday said it would propose reversing the Trump-era
loosening of vehicle
emissions rules with a new plan to boost efficiency 10% in the
2023 model
year and aiming for a fleet average of 52 miles per gallon by
2026.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency proposal also calls
for a near 5%
stringency increase in each model year from 2024 through 2026.
But it would
not seek to reverse former President Donald Trump's rollbacks
in fuel
efficiency standards for the 2021 or 2022 model years.

The plan is a big increase from Trump's proposal for vehicle
fuel efficiency
by 2026 of just 43.3 mpg. The Biden administration said EPA
rules would
require higher efficiency by 2026 than former President Barack
Obama's
administration would have mandated through 2025.

The Democratic administrations of Biden and Obama have pushed
for stricter
fuel efficiency standards to reduce greenhouse gas omissions
and fight
climate change. In March 2020, Trump's Republican
administration rolled back
Obama's standards to require only 1.5% annual increases in
efficiency
through 2026. Obama had required 5% annual increases.


Report ad
The EPA said through the 2026 model year "the new vehicle fleet
likely will
continue to consist primarily of gasoline-fueled vehicles." It
estimates
electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric will account for
8% of new U.S
. vehicle sales by 2026.

The EPA projects the requirements will cost $150 billion to
$240 billion
through 2025 from higher vehicle costs, but save motorists $120
billion to $
250 billion in fuel costs and have net benefits of $86 billion
to $140
billion including other things like improved public health and
reduced
pollution.

EPA said by 2050 the proposal would "reduce gasoline
consumption by more
than 290 million barrels" a nearly 10% reduction.

In 2020, the EPA said the Trump plan would hike U.S. oil
consumption by
about 500,000 barrels per day.


Report ad
The EPA assumes that under the rule Americans will drive 449
billion more
miles, up 0.5% as the costs of driving declines due to the
improvement in
fuel economy,

EPA estimates that over 30 years "total

fatalities will increase by 2,288, with 1,952 deaths attributed
to increased
driving and 336 deaths attributed to the increase in fatality
risk."

The transportation sector is the largest U.S. source of
greenhouse emissions
, representing 29% of total emissions -- and light-duty
vehicles account for
58% of the transportation emissions.


Report ad
The EPA also proposes to restore the advanced technology
vehicle multiplier
credits "to encourage manufacturers to accelerate the
introduction of zero
and near-zero emissions vehicles" and restore the 2012 rule’s
"full-size
pickup truck incentives for strong hybrids" through 2025.

It would also boost "off-cycle" credits that recognize the
emissions
benefits of technologies that are not captured on the EPA
compliance tests.
"These include technologies such as

high-efficiency headlamps or solar reflective paint that keeps
the vehicle
cabin cooler to reduce air conditioning needs," EPA said.

EPA plans a public hearing on Aug. 25 and public comments must
be received
by Sept. 27.

Reporting by David Shepardson Editing by Chris Reese and David
Gregorio
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

[上一篇] [下一篇] [发表评论] [写信问候] [收藏] [举报] 
 
暂无评论
 
用户名: 密码:
发表评论
评论:
[返回顶部] [刷新]  [给awaydream写信]  [天下兴亡,匹夫有责首页] [博客首页] [BBS 未名空间站]
 
Site Map - Contact Us - Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy

版权所有BBS 未名空间站(mitbbs.com) since 1996