当前在线人数15738
首页 - 分类讨论区 - 学术学科 - 律师事务所版 - 同主题阅读文章

此篇文章共收到打赏
0

  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
您目前伪币余额:0
未名交友
[更多]
[更多]
Re-Emphasis of Board Policies
[版面:律师事务所][首篇作者:gongxifacai] , 2007年05月07日19:30:36 ,8812次阅读,4次回复
来APP回复,赚取更多伪币 关注本站公众号:
[分页:1 ]
gongxifacai
进入未名形象秀
我的博客
[回复] [回信给作者] [本篇全文] [本讨论区] [修改] [删除] [转寄] [转贴] [收藏] [举报] [ 1 ]

发信人: gongxifacai (恭喜发财), 信区: Law
标  题: Re-Emphasis of Board Policies
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon May  7 19:37:42 2007), 转信

Re-emphasis of Board Policies

As I said before, as the BM, I wish to be very much hands-off - a more
interventionist approach takes up more time, after all, and we don't have
all that much to spare.I wish to state categorically that I do not have any
desire to suppress criticism; bear in mind, though, that the basic rule of
the board is "please keep discussions generally polite".

That said I will be policing the following categories a bit more stringently
than I may have done in the past:

*Potentially legally actionable*

No debate on this one. If it looks a bit iffy, it's gone. Sorry, but none of
us can afford a court case.

*Foul or abusive*

Zero tolerance on personal attacks, name-calling, etc. Wherever possible in
such cases, I will attempt to retain the content of the post, but simply
remove the offensive wording.

*Deliberately or persistently disruptive*

Similar to the above. If there is any valid content to the message, I will
attempt to convey that, by paraphrasing if necessary. Often, though, posts
in this category are content-free.

*Spam*

Gone. No discussion.

*No "majia" or sockpuppets*

Posting under multiple names to make it appear that a number of people
support your view or to attack another person is prohibited. Hopefully,
registration of MITBBS will make this more difficult to do. Doing this
is a serious breach of netiquette and I will remove any postings that I can
prove are sockpuppets.

--
※ 修改:·gongxifacai 于 May  7 19:59:44 修改本文·[FROM: 65.96.]
※ 来源:·BBS 未名空间站 海外: mitbbs.com 中国: mitbbs.cn·[FROM: 65.96.]



 
ncode
进入未名形象秀
我的博客
[回复] [回信给作者] [本篇全文] [本讨论区] [修改] [删除] [转寄] [转贴] [收藏] [举报] [ 2 ]

发信人: ncode (真麻烦), 信区: Law
标  题: Re: Re-Emphasis of Board Policies
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon May  7 23:02:48 2007)

I'm curious what posts triggered such hot reaction from the cool BM? I haven
't seen anything recently that come close to any of the prohibitions BM
listed here.
--

※ 来源:·BBS 未名空间站 海外: mitbbs.com 中国: mitbbs.cn·[FROM: 71.249.]

 
czjd
进入未名形象秀
我的博客
[回复] [回信给作者] [本篇全文] [本讨论区] [修改] [删除] [转寄] [转贴] [收藏] [举报] [ 3 ]

发信人: czjd (I am SalaryInfo), 信区: Law
标  题: Re: Re-Emphasis of Board Policies
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon May  7 23:04:47 2007)

I posted some nasty @#$#. BM deleted it, and I agree that it should be
deleted.
--

※ 来源:·BBS 未名空间站 海外: mitbbs.com 中国: mitbbs.cn·[FROM: 71.63.]

 
gongxifacai
进入未名形象秀
我的博客
[回复] [回信给作者] [本篇全文] [本讨论区] [修改] [删除] [转寄] [转贴] [收藏] [举报] [ 4 ]

发信人: gongxifacai (恭喜发财), 信区: Law
标  题: Re: Re-Emphasis of Board Policies
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon May  7 23:42:28 2007)

Thanks for the understanding, czjd.
BTW: I don't think the Duke MBAs have a case here. :)

【 在 czjd (I am SalaryInfo) 的大作中提到: 】
: I posted some nasty @#$#. BM deleted it, and I agree that it should be
: deleted.



--


The information in this post is not guaranteed to be correct, complete, or
current. I make no warranty, expressed or implied, about the accuracy or
reliability of the information presented.


※ 来源:·BBS 未名空间站 海外: mitbbs.com 中国: mitbbs.cn·[FROM: 24.60.]

 
czjd
进入未名形象秀
我的博客
[回复] [回信给作者] [本篇全文] [本讨论区] [修改] [删除] [转寄] [转贴] [收藏] [举报] [ 5 ]

发信人: czjd (I am SalaryInfo), 信区: Law
标  题: Re: Re-Emphasis of Board Policies
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue May  8 01:41:44 2007)

I don't think they have a case, either. However, it's the fact that this guy
feels so victimized that bothers me.
--

※ 来源:·BBS 未名空间站 海外: mitbbs.com 中国: mitbbs.cn·[FROM: 71.63.]

[分页:1 ]
[快速返回] [ 进入律师事务所讨论区] [返回顶部]
回复文章
标题:
内 容:

未名交友
将您的链接放在这儿

友情链接


 

Site Map - Contact Us - Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy

版权所有,未名空间(mitbbs.com),since 1996