发信人: WangLimin (王利民), 信区: Chinese
标 题: NYS Workers' Comp, Limin Wang, The Pursuit of Truth
关键字: NYS,Workers Compensation,Limin Wang,Pursuit,Truth
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Dec 18 15:06:38 2019, 美东)
136-09 59th Ave
Flushing, NY 11355
December 18, 2019
State of New York
Workers’ Compensation Board
PO BOX 5205
Binghamton, NY 13902-5205
Tel: (877) 632-4996
RE: The Pursuit of Truth
Part 1. The Truth of the Nov. 08, 2019 IME at Dr. Robert S April’s Office;
Part 2. My Repudiation to Dr. RSA Report of the Nov. 08, 2019 IME;
Part 3. My Response to Dr. RSA’s 2nd Review of Documents;
Part 4. Legal Brief for my Oct. 31, 2019 Appeal
WCB Case #: G2029240
Stated Carrier: Indemnity Ins. Of N. America (PO Box 5122 Scranton, PA 18505
Carrier ID: W112502
Carrier Case #: 18D48F512440
Date of Injury at Workplace: January 16, 2018, Tue, around 11:05 AM
Employer: Direct: B.Q. Wide Auto Body Parts Supply, Inc (109-35 178th St.,
Jamaica, NY 11433); abbr. B.Q. Wide
Headquarters: KSI Trading Corporation
Professional Employment Organization: TriNet/SOI
Third Party Administrator (TPA): Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc. (
PO Box 1127, Neptune, NJ 07754); abbr, CCMSI.
My Former WC Attorney’s Law Firm: Bangel, Cohen & Falconetti, LLP (91-31
Queens Blvd, Suite 400, Elmhurst, NY 11373); abbr, BCF
IME Vendor used by Employer/TPA: Brookside Consultants, Inc. (120 Madison St
., Suite 100, Chittenango, NY 13037); abbr, BCI.
Some Treating Clinics/Physicians:
New York City Medical & Neurological Offices, PC (91-31 Queens Blvd, Suite
601, Elmhurst, NY 11373); abbr. NYCMNO; Dr. Mehrdad Golzad
New York Medical & Diagnostic Center (80-46 Kew Gardens Rd, Kew Gardens, NY
11415); abbr. NYMDC; Dr. Martin Gillman, Dr. Jacob Sadigh; Dr. Benjamin Uh;
Dr. Yazan Rajai Jabaji; Dr. Mitchell Kaphan; Dr. Naik Appasaheb; PT Aji
Thariyan; A Jew Technician; A Blackman Technician
IME: Rescheduled from Nov. 14, 2019, 10:30 AM to Nov. 08, 2019, 12:30 PM, at
120 E. 86th St., 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10028 (the clinic of Park Avenue
Medical Professionals); abbr, PAMP, with Dr. Robert S. April; abbr, Dr. RSA,
IME staff: a young, plus-sized, black woman front-desk who one of her female
colleagues called Joanna (her real name is not certain though).
Interpreter: a Chinese-looking mid-aged lady, imposed by BCI or other party,
not by me. I didn’t need interpretation service at IME.
Kathy: the person on my calls to Brookside Consultants, Inc.
Me: the injured worker/claimant, a mid-aged man
My daughter: a younger teenage, going with me for my IME
SOWL: a Short Old White Lady, of PAMP, with white long medical coat
WPV: a woman polite voice, who called the IME staff as Joanna
Attacking physician: Dr. Charles S. Saha, of PAMP, an Indian-looking male,
who I identified online later
Policemen: one short officer (coined name Shoff), the other tall officer (
coined as Toff)
EMS: two males and one female
RSA Questionnaire: three-page, first two pages with texted questions, last
page with only A- and P-view diagrams of whole body. The whole Q is titled
as “Claimant Intake Form” and headed as
Robert S. April, MD, P.C
120 E 86th Street
New York, NY 10028
Two printout packs: each pack has six pages. One is my Aug. 07, 2019 version
statement of my routine workload, the fall at work, the aftermath, and the
recent symptoms; the other is the three previous files from Brookside
Consultants Inc. to the NYS WCB eCase folder, which include NECK as one of
the established injury sites. Somehow, since the record review and IME by Dr
. Robert S. April later this year of 2019, BCI simply deleted NECK from the
established injury sites. These BCI files have never been directly given to
me the injured worker/claimant by any other party, and these BCI files are
all disguised as Medical Narrative from one treating doctor, Dr. Mehrdad
Golzad. IME Dr. RSA accepted these two printouts at my third presentation to
him during the Nov. 08, 2019 IME.
Three CDs: of diagnostic imaging data since DOI, including MRI’s and X-ray
Feb. 15, 2018 MRI w/o contrast on Head, from Alpha 3T MRI & Diagnostic
Imaging, 145 East 32nd St., New York, NY 10016 (Referral direct to Alpha 3T
by Dr. Mehrdad Golzad);
Mar. 24, 2018 MRI w/o contrast on left shoulder and left elbow (Referral on
Neighborhood form by Dr. Benjamin Uh, who NEVER requested a cervical spine
MRI, although the Feb. 16, 2018 medical report of his first seeing me stated
the opposite way), Apr. 02, 2018 MRI w/o contrast on left hand, Apr. 12,
2018 MRI w/o contrast on cervical spine (these two MRIs were requested by me
to Dr. Yazan Rajai Jabaji, then both Dr. Jabaji and Dr. Jacob Sadigh made
this referral on a Neighborhood form), from Neighborhood Radiology Services,
PC, 92-37 Metropolitan Ave, Forest Hills, NY 11375. Neighborhood made many
excuses to first deny and then delay the MRI service, particularly on
Aug. 15, 2019 MRI w/o contrast on cervical spine, Oct. 01, 2019 MRI w/o
contrast on lumbar spine, Oct. 03, 2019 MRI w/o contrast on thoracic spine (
referral by Dr. John M. Caridi), from Main Street Radiology, 136-25 37th Ave
, Flushing, NY 11354;
Feb. 15, 2018 X-ray on cervical spine (lateral and AP), left shoulder (
neutral AP, and abduct AP), left wrist (hand as a fist, lateral and PA), by
Dr. Martin Brett Gillman, Mar. 08, 2018 X-ray on cervical spine (lateral of
flexion, neutral, and extension, AP, AND open-mouth) by a black technician,
both at New York Medical & Diagnostic Center, 80-46 Kew Gardens Rd, Kew
Gardens, NY 11415. NYMDC has been denying my access to and even the
existence of the open-mouth view which had two takes. NYS DOH Office of
Professional Medical Conduct recently started to handle this complaint.
After being factually threatened, insulted, and assaulted during the so-
called Independent Medical Examination (IME) by Dr. Robert S. April and his
colleagues at Park Avenue Medical Professionals (120 E. 86 St., New York, NY
10028) on Nov. 08, 2019, Fri., I received, on Nov. 16, 2019, Sat., a
regular mail from Brookside Consultants, Inc., the IME vendor of all the
IMEs requested by employer B.Q. Wide Auto Body Parts Supply, Inc. and/or TPA
Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc. The mail has a separate sheet to
carry only the mail-to info, and a stapled pack of total twelve sheets (a
filled & signed IME-4 5-18 by Robert April on Nov. 12, 2019 along with his
seven-page narrative, then a sheet of BCI’s distribution list of this RSA
report, and then a copy of the three-page RSA questionnaire I filled and
signed at the beginning of the Nov. 08, 2019 visit. Although I had
experienced Dr. RSA’s previous laundry report of medical-record-only review
, I’m still so flabbergasted and personally insulted to read through this
Dr. Robert S. April’s intentionally manipulated expletive IME report.
Based on my records, recall, and interpretation, I’m hereby to reveal a
truthful whole account of what really happened during the Nov. 08, 2019 IME
visit, and to expose some conspired actions of my opponent parties in this
case of premeditated and coordinated murder attempt to my life.
Part 1. The Truth of the Nov. 08, 2019 IME at Dr. Robert S. April’s Office
The IME Schedule and Re-Schedule
On Oct 22 & 23, 2019, I called Brookside Consultants, Inc., thrice at (866)
455-3926 about their originally scheduled Nov. 14, 2019, 10:30 a.m. IME
appointment with Dr. RSA. The IME appointment notice’s instructions state,
“Please bring all X-rays, MRIs, medical reports, etc. with you to the
examination.” and “If you do not speak English, please bring an
interpreter.” I told BCI, a lady naming herself Kathy on the phone, that it
’s an IME requested by my opponent parties, and the opponent parties have
access to the medical reports and imaging data, so it’s on their duty and
at their likes to selectively provide or not the IME doctor the “record”.
And I suggested that the IME requestors request the diagnostic images
directly from clinics or facilities for Dr. RSA’s early review. And I told
that I would bring CDs of diagnostic imaging and some printouts to the IME,
and I would record the IME. Kathy and I were talking in English. Kathy said
an interpreter would be provided to me, and I clearly rejected such “offer
” of interpretation service on an IME.
On Oct. 28th, 2019, Mon., I called (866)455-3926 and talked to Kathy for a
re-schedule of the IME, and Kathy offered a Nov. 08, 2019, Fri., 12:30 PM
appointment, which was later finalized by another Notice (Doc ID????), whose
cover letter includes, “bring the following with you for your scheduled
examination: PHOTO IDENTIFICATION, All diagnostic films including x-rays, CT
scans, Myelograms, and or MRI’s to this appointment for review by the
physician. Actual films must be reviewed, as reports will not be acceptable.
You can access these films by contacting the facilities where they were
performed and you may request that they be mailed directly to the physician
’s office or you also bring them with you at the time of your appointment.
” It’s so absurd that the IME requestors load the preparation burden on me
while they request the IME and have access to all these original imaging
data known to them. Moreover, my opponent parties had already conspired to
later ridiculously blame me for RSA’s excluding any of his “evaluation”
on these diagnostic imaging data. The Nov. 08, 2019, 12:30 p.m. IME
appointment was restated by a BCI postcard I received on Nov. 02, 2019.
At the Clinic, Before Entering RSA’s Exam Room
Simple facts such as time can be easily verified by electronic devices. My
child and I were allowed in through two locked doors at the ground level and
arrived at the second-floor clinic’s front desk at ~12:25 p.m., i.e.,
about five minutes ahead of the 12:30 p.m. appointment. The interpreter (a
Chinese-looking mid-aged lady) came from inside the clinic to introduce
herself to me, in front of the front desk. A flock of female personnel then
came out from inside to the front desk and started to gossip. I clearly told
the interpreter and the front desk young plus-sized black woman that I didn
’t ask for and I don’t need an interpreter for this event. Since later a
polite woman voice (PWV) from this clinic multiple-times called clear and
loud this black woman as Joanna, so I would refer this front-desk person as
Joanna in the file. I provided my NYS driver license to Joanna as she
requested photo ID immediately after I entered PAMP. Joanna typed my DL
information on her computer and scanned the DL too. I was answered by Joanna
to not sign in on the appointment check-in strip. Also, I confirmed the
interpreter’s inquiry that it’s my daughter who came together with me.
After about three minutes at the front desk, I got from Joanna a clipboard
with a three-page questionnaire on. The questionnaire is titled as “
Claimant Intake Form” and referred to as such in RSA’s report, but I would
prefer to call it Questionnaire.
Then I spent about forty minutes seriously filling in the Questionnaire on
the waiting area’s couch. My child sat next to me, and further distantly
away the interpreter, on the same row. During these forty minutes, I
noticed only another person was staying briefly in the spacious waiting area
, and a female was conversating and laughing loudly in the clinic for quite
a while (nobody made any fuss about that), and Dr. Robert S. April came out
TWICE to talk to me. The first time, he came in front of me and looked
amicably along the row at my child and the interpreter woman, and asked me
who’s the patient to see him. I matched his face with his online images,
and answered “me”. RSA then asked me a stupid and irritating question in a
seemingly innocent way, whether my younger-teenage daughter is my wife. I’
m a mid-40s looking a lot older than before the injuries. The interpreter
woman looks in her 40s or 50s. My daughter looks as a typical younger
teenage with youth acne on face. RSA, M.D., looks to be in his 80s. I
answered in an annoyed tone, “She is my CHILD.” When I told him that I
would turn the recording on for the talk, RSA backed off, saying that the
exam hasn’t started yet. By around One:Ten p.m., RSA came out to me at the
same spot again, telling me to start the IME now. Since I was about to
finish the 1st-round on the Questionnaire, I then rushed to finish it and
turned it to Joanna.
But Dr. Robert S. April quickly changed face at the door of his exam room,
claiming that my teenage child isn’t allowed in to witness and record the
IME. Instead, RSA wanted the interpreter in. Here is the transcript:
I: …Start the exam now?
RSA: Yes, I’d like some exam…I haven’t examined you.
I: Uhm, at where?
RSA: Right here.
I: Ok, then I go in.
RSA: Ok, who is coming in with you?
I: Uhm uhm, my child.
I: Because I, uhm, need a company. Uha,a, later on this will pro, most
likely will go for a trial. If not going for a trial, there will go for
RSA interrupts: Uh, I didn’t ask for that. I would like to examine you
alone. I don’t see any need to have anybody else.
I: No, it’s my right. It’s my right to have a company.
RSA: No, you don’t. It’s not yours.
RSA: This is my office, my friend.
I: No, this is IME.
RSA interrupts: Then leave.
I: but the…
RSA rapidly repeats: Leave, Leave.
I: but the, but the IME
RSA continues: Leave, then Leave.
RSA: I am not, I am not in a fight with you. I’m going to leave it now.
I: Why, why, why you kept…
RSA interrupts: Because I don’t want anybody in the room except you, and
I: No, no, because…
RSA interrupts: Because what?
I: Because, because, because the law says, it says the IME…
RSA interrupts: You sit down and have your mouth closed. This is an office,
and you’re disrupting. Please sit down.
I: Because I don’t want an interpreter.
I didn’t follow his dictator-style COMMANDS to leave or sit down or have my
mouth closed. At this moment, Dr. Robert S. April ferociously SLAMMED his
office shut from inside.
I said to the interpreter: I don’t need an interpreter.
The interpreter still followed me, and during this time, Joanna went to me
and gave me a photocopy of my filled & signed Questionnaire. The episode of
drama happened less than two minutes, at around One:Ten p.m. And this is
only a beginning of a series of subsequent nasty events.
Dr. Robert S. April is a professional IME physician working on insurances’
side for years and is hired by IME vendor Brookside Consultants, Inc.
However, he acted as if he didn’t understand the IME rules or had never
experienced an IME of a patient with his/her company aside. Joanna and other
personnel in PAMP all acted as if they didn’t know I have that right, but
none of them would contact BCI about this. Instead, once again, several
women flocked from inside to the front desk area and then loudly gossiped
about me. Joanna acted as if she hadn’t heard any of the several occasions
that I told them the person coming together with me is my daughter/child, or
as if she had never browsed my filled-in Questionnaire I had turned in to
her. The upper-right area of the 1st-page on the Questionnaire prints, “Who
came with you today?” I wrote, “my child (dependent legally)”. Does RSA
’s Questionnaire, particularly this question, betray their vicious lies
about my right of being accompanied? One gossiper asked Joanna, and then
Joanna talked loudly, “He wants his wife or whoever that is…” I raised my
voice to correct her immediately, “NO, it’s my CHILD.” Moment
afterwards, Joanna continued her loud talk like a rapper to other gossipers,
“Who is that, who is that, no, he is a legal whore.” The disaster of my
family, more specifically of my wife, is known to many, including to
governments. There are always some “human s” intentionally in an open or
veiled way to hurt others on the most painful spots. This had been a long “
norm” to me at my employment B.Q. Wide.
During this round of noisy talk from ~One:Ten to ~One:Twenty-four p.m. in
the front desk area, although I was evidently talking in English to them,
Joanna and other talked together to force the interpreter in and my child
out of the IME “still-available by Dr. RSA”. Joanna wanted me to call
Brookside to get BCI’s opinion about the requirement of an interpreter. A
short old white lady (SOWL) came out from inside and persuaded only me to
lower down the voice, and instructed me to call whoever sent me here, and
told that Dr. RSA rents there.
At a later point of this round, RSA came to the front desk area, saying to
me and my child, “You have to leave”, “I’m leaving here. Goodbye.
Goodbye”, “No, it’s not open for you. You can leave. Thank you. They don
’t ant the exam. Thank you.”
After RSA claimed such, I at One:Twenty p.m. called the IME vendor Brookside
Consultants, Inc. at (866) 455-3926, and told the receiver Kathy that my
family member was not allowed in the IME, and Dr. Robert S. April said no
IME. Kathy told me to hold on the phone for her to find out. I hung up the
less than two minutes call. Later the day, I found two missed phone calls (
at One:Twenty-Three and One:Thirty p.m.) from (315) 451-7722. Online search
confirms that it’s BCI’s work phone #, but the two voice messages left
were completely blank.
A minute or two after my 1st phone call, Joanna again told me that Dr. RSA
was going to examine me, and so led me and my child to the door of RSA’s
space. The interpreter followed again. A moment later, Joanna came out to
RSA’s office to tell us to go in. I then directly asked the interpreter’s
I: Can I know the identity of the, uh, interpreter?
Joanna: I, identity, I don’t, I don’t know.
I: Who sent the uhuhuhuh interpreter?
Interpreter: Uh, legal interpreter service.
The same SOWL lady now came out of the office next to RSA’s and jumped in
to answer, “We don’t have nothing with the interpreter. It’s your legal
firm.” It’s so odd, because I had BCF as my WC case attorney, but for long
I have been without an attorney or representative. The interpreter murmured
to Joanna, and
Joanna: Ok, so it’s a legal language interpreter. They are in contracted
I: I don’t trust Brookside at all, so…
Joanna: But they…
SOWL interrupts: But we have, we know nothing. We know nothing about. We don
’t deal with the interpreter.
I: OK, so…
SOWL interrupts: Make sure, just make sure these attorneys aware of that,
RSA came out of his inner office to his exam room’s door to interrupt: If
you don’t want him in here, he’ll leave.
I [confused whom RSA means “him” or “he”]: The…
SOWL interrupts: No, he is coming here.
[The interpreter is apparently a “she” or “her”. It’s confusing whom
SOWL means “he”.]
RSA: Ok, it’s up to you. I don’t want any disruption.
[Isn’t it so absurd? RSA himself started the series of disruption by
denying my right of being accompanied by an individual of my choice during
the IME. As later in his IME report, he put all the blames on me, on my “
SOWL: But I just don’t want any loud voice on cell phone.
[Now, SOWL also picked on me of “loud voice” on “cell phone”. She was
the one telling me to call whoever sent me here. I made only one short phone
call, exactly total duration of one minute and thirty-nine seconds, to BCI,
at a volume not exceeding SOWL’s, as I judge. SOWL was seen simply sitting
in front of a desk, and I didn’t ask her to come to join the talk. Later,
many more things happened, and I believe the whole drama had been
orchestrated by them, and they judge everything and blame everything on me.
I: I don’t want a loud, loud…
RSA interrupts: Keep your voice down, please.
I: But I need, I talk pretty much this way, and so I want …
[My hearing, evaluated by myself, has been impaired too due to the Jan. 16,
2018 fall. But no treating or IME physician would ever consider the
impairment. Like in this IME, they instead take my “loud” talk as probably
signs of non-civilization! Sarcastic enough?]
RSA interrupts: Why don’t you just stop talking. You come in here.
I: Ok. So I don’t need an interpreter.
SOWL: It’s, it’s. Whatever you want.
I: Yeah. I don’t feel comfortable. [Because this was the only time a real-
person interpreter was provided on this near two-year-old WC case, not due
to my request, but IMPOSED by opponent parties. When I asked for interpreter
service at WC hearings, none was provided. Once a tele-interpreter was
provided, but WCLJ restricted me to talk in my native language only, and I
stuttered in my native language too, and the tele-interpretation was awfully
In Dr. Robert S. April’s Exam Room
Then, only my daughter and I went in the exam room. The interpreter didn’t
follow in. The time was ~One:Twenty-Four p.m. By my record, my daughter and
I exited his exam room at ~One:Forty-Six p.m. These whole twenty-two minutes
include my ditched attempt to put up a camera on a tripod, my undressing,
the talks, the ~five-minute IME, my thrice and twice presenting directly to
RSA the two printout packs and the three image CDs respectively, and my re-
dressing. On many issues, the reality is in diagonal contrast to what is
stated in Dr. Robert S. April’s IME report.
The First Three and a Half Minutes (~1:24 - ~1:28 p.m.)
I tried to mount my simple camera on my simple tripod, but the exam room is
very tiny and stuffed. My child said she could video-tape just with the
camera itself, so I packed the tripod back. Dr. RSA was sitting and working
on his desktop in his inner office. During this time, a phone rang in his
office and a female voice came on the speaker, and then RSA was talking on
the phone briefly.
The Demanded Undressing to Only Underwear and Putting on a Robe (~1:28 - ~1:
I took my coat and jacket off already, and talked to Dr. RSA for the
starting of IME. After moment of neglecting me, RSA came out of his inner
office to his exam room. RSA wanted me to undress until only underwear and
to put on a robe he handed over. He then backed into office.
RSA: Put on this. Take off your outer clothes.
I: You have, you have a slippers?
I: You have a slippers?
RSA: No, no.
I: Then I need to put on my shoes.
RSA: Then keep on your shoes.
Then I untied my shoelaces, took off my shoes halfway, and leaned to take my
outer pants off. Then I shoved my feet back into shoes. During this process
, my hips somehow cramped with sharp ache, which last minutes at least
before becoming unnoticeable. After with only inner loose long-sleeved layer
on, I talked to RSA again.
I: And I need to keep my, la, keep my, keep my, la, inside clothes on.
RSA: What’s that?
I: I need to keep my inside clothes on.
RSA: I don’t understand you.
I: I need to keep my inner layers on.
My younger-teenage daughter who speaks native English: He likes to keep his
RSA: I don’t understand the word you say.
My daughter: He would like to keep his shirt on.
I [having experienced this kind of pretenders very often at particular
occasions]: So, I don’t know, understand your word you saying.
RSA: Then get me the interpreter, I will continue.
RSA: Then leave.
RSA: Then leave.
I: No, you’re just pretending…
RSA interrupts: Leave, leave. No, I’m not going to examine you.
I: Oh, okey, you’re just pretending.
RSA: You do it my way, or leave. Good bye.
I: I’ll just do, I’ll just …
RSA interrupts, and demands: I’m not going to fight you on every single
step. This is my office, and you’re my guest. This is what you’re going to
need. Put on. [he touched the wrapped robe.]
I: I don’t come here because I want to come here. I come here, it’s
because of the injury.
Then, Dr. RSA backed into his inner office. Around this time, a phone rang
again, Dr. RSA then talked on the phone for about half a minute. He
mentioned about “taking clothes off” and ended his phone with “Ok, Ok”.
It’s about One:Thirty p.m.
RSA: Thank you. It’s off. We’re not doing this.
I [surprised]: Uhm?
RSA [firm and loud]: No. Sorry.
I: He said this? [I misspoke. I meant “she”, Kathy at BCI.]
RSA: They don’t want me to continue. [RSA never answered me who are “they
”, as he multiple times talked “they”.]
I: Are you sure?
I: They will later probably will lie, about saying that it’s I didn’t
attend the IME. Are you sure? You don’t want to come…
[My opponents, from the employer, TPA, their law firm, and some people
working at NYS Workers’ Compensation Board, fabricated blatant lies as
record or on decision that many of their IMEs I didn’t attend. The fact is
I attended all their IMEs with all their appointed IME doctors. For the
twice IMEs with Dr. William B. Head, Jr., it’s THEIR faults or decisions,
so I had no IME report on the first visit to Dr. WBH office, and the IME was
cancelled after I arrived on the second visit.]
RSA interrupts: What did you say? …
I continue: You don’t want to come to the challenge to, do, for the IME
they want to set up?
Dr. RSA heard this, and started to exit his inner office. When passing by me
, RSA talked.
RSA: Excuse me, please. If you put that on, I will exam you.
I: I’ll, I’ll…
My child: So put it on now, put it on, Dad.
I: It’s because of my personal religion. I just want to put my inner
RSA: I don’t understand what you’re saying.
I: I don’t understand what you say.
Dr. RSA’s IME report quoted this sentence. RSA lied first on this, and I
used the same sentence to poke at his lie. My child urged me to follow what
the doctor demanded on the undressing and dressing.
RSA to my child: Tell him. Whatever language he understand. Put on…
I became agitated. Although as stated in his IME report the opposite about
the causer of problems, Dr. Robert S. April is the demander and commander in
this IME. I have the right to be accompanied by a family member, but old
RSA denied my right multiple rounds. There is no need of an interpreter
imposed by my opponents during the IME, but RSA kept imposing the
interpreter. Later, RSA’s exam on me indicated no need at all for me to
take off my inner loose layer off, RSA demanded the undressing level. My
daughter was in the room too, and I needed to figure out how to show as
little nudity as possible. My child was persuading me not to argue with RSA.
I then threw the plastic-wrapped and folded robe back to the pile of unused
RSA heard and saw, then said: Leave, please leave.
I: I want my, uh, uh, I want to keep my, uh uh… [forgot words]
RSA: I don’t want you to. I want to exam your body. That’s what you are
I: I, yeah, you can, you can examine my body.
RSA: Please leave.
I: What, you can examine my body. I don’t want that kind of things put on
me. [I meant changing to robe.]
RSA interrupts: …shut. Leave. Leave. You’re finished.
I: No, no, no, no, no.
RSA: I’m leaving in a few minutes. You can stay here. We’ll call police,
I: You call the police.
This was the first time Dr. Robert S. April openly said to me he would call
police on me, while RSA exited the exam room to the pathway. It’s ~One:
Thirty-One p.m. Later, when police was called in by me, the tall policeman
kept saying “Dr. RSA has a lot of other patients to see” to avoid multiple
points. Seconds after RSA’s exit, the interpreter, not uniformed police,
was about to come into the exam room. I was yielding to undress further and
to put on the robe, and I said to the mid-aged interpreter lady.
I: No, you don’t want, I don’t want you in. I don’t want you in, sorry.
Interpreter [softly, in English]: so stay outside?
I: Yeah. I don’t want.
RSA shows up at the door to interrupt with angry and loud voice: Isn’t this
clear? I don’t want YOU here. Clear?
RSA stresses word by word: I DON’T WANT YOU HERE.
I to Interpreter: I don’t want you in. I don’t want here…
RSA interrupts while entering his office: Please leave, because I’m leaving
. Nothing is going to happen here.
I: Nothing is going to happen?
My child urged me to change to the robe. In the next two minutes or so, with
my child not looking at me, I did what RSA demanded about the clothing.
Then I talked to Dr. RSA who was sitting and working on his computer desk.
The time was ~One:Thirty-Five p.m.
The ~Five-Minutes Independent Medical Examination (~1:36 - ~1:41 p.m.)
I had my underwear, socks and shoes on the normal way, and the role was
pulled front on. After moment of ignoring me, Dr. RSA responded. I then
asked him for the 1st time where I could give the image CDs to him. RSA didn
’t answer on that, instead, he interrupted to ask me, “May I seek you walk
?” I then shuffled a little to let him pass by. He didn’t tell me to tip-
toe or heel-walk. The following ~five-minutes Independent Medical
Examination (IME) was rushed quickly through by Dr. Robert S. April.
RSA then grabbed a ~1 ft long reflex hammer (one end a disc, the other end
tapered to a point without a cap) and wanted to move my clothes and backpack
away from a rolling stool, and I did the move-away. Then RSA told me to bow
, so I did the spine flexion gently and slowly toward the door frame. RSA
wanted things fast, so he grabbed my shoulders to pull me back upright and
then forced the passive spine rotation left and right once, lateral bending
left and right once, and slightly but quickly moved his hand over my upper
back once. Then he told me to sit on the cabinet exam table.
Since I laid the two printout packs and some personal items on the exam
table, I presented the printouts the 1st time to Dr. RSA. The two printouts
are about my workload, the fall, the aftermath, recent symptoms, and BCI’s
three previous documents of the established injury sites which all include
Neck. RSA took over and briefly browsed the first page of each printout, and
said he had them already and had reviewed “the whole chart”, and then put
the two printout packs aside.
After I sat down on the exam table, RSA, still on the rolling stool, used
the reflex hammer to slightly tap my left knee-cap, and quickly moved to
slightly tap my right knee tendon. My left and right legs showed no and very
little reflex, respectively. I questioned RSA about his deep tendon reflex
procedure. RSA didn’t respond on that, but quickly tape-measured around my
lower legs each once. Then RSA told me to hold my arms up in a “surrender”
posture. I did it half-way up. RSA then pulled my arms upwards, and I
complained the extra pain on my back and elbows as he asked where. Then, RSA
quickly rolled up the robe’s sleeves to my shoulders, and circled around
my left UPPER arm twice. I saw clearly that the soft tape was diagonally
dangling around left upper arm. RSA then swiftly moved to tape around my
right UPPER arm once. I was still questioning RSA about the knee reflex
procedure, and he pretty much hum-hummed to himself on this.
Then RSA told me to look at his right index finger which moved to his right
thrice, and to his left twice, and upwards twice or thrice, and I raised my
eyelids. During this eyeball movement test, RSA slurred something, and then
clearly claimed that I was not cooperating. I told him THAT’S THE LEVEL I
COULD DO, and opined that he’s not really examining.
RSA then slightly tapped the reflex hammer on my elbows’ interior bending
and on my forearms’ wrist-end thumb-side, each once. For the left elbow
only, he knocked the hammer over his thumb above my elbow. I didn’t see
much movement other than of the big and painful jolt when the tap was on
near my right wrist area.
RSA’s hands then held my head’s frontal and temporal areas, gently bending
my head forward modestly, and then gently extended back to normal position,
and then gently rotated my head to my left. I complained head and neck pain
during his maneuver, so he took his hands off and used his index finger to
direct me to rotate my head to my right once.
Immediately after this, RSA pulled the mercury column over for blood
pressure measurement. Here is the transcript of that episode.
RSA: Do you have any medical disease?
RSA repeats, in a second: Do you have any medical illness?
I: I don’t know what you mean “medical disease” thing. I just got the
RSA interrupts before I finish: I don’t understand you, sorry.
I: I don’t, I don’t, I don’t…
RSA interrupts: That’s why we need an interpreter.
When he asked about “disease” and once again claimed “I don’t understand
you”, I presented him the 2nd time the two printout packs for him to later
read and understand. He put the printouts back to the stand. Around this
time, RSA was wrapping and pumping the cuff around my left upper arm twice,
but twice the cuff’s Velcro snapped open. During these failed BP
measurements, RSA asked me.
RSA: You have high blood pressure?
I [cool]: I think some doctors claim that way.
RSA: I see.
I: They are all, uh, doing together.
The third time, RSA wrapped the cuff very loosely around my upper left arm,
held it in position by his left hand, and then the air-pumping didn’t snap
the Velcro open. RSA didn’t use the stethoscope at all for BP measurement.
The chest-piece was nowhere on my body, and the eartips were still hanging
at the back of his neck, not in his ears. RSA only held my left wrist by his
left hand, and when the mercury column dropped rather quickly to probably
around 140-120 mmHg, he let the air gush out and the mercury column plummet
Then RSA quickly moved to put the stethoscope’s chest-piece momentarily
over three spots around collarbones/neck area (front middle and two sides),
with the eartips now in his ears.
After the stethoscope moves, RSA asked me in a strong doubting tone, “Where
do you have pain?” I answered, “I have pain all over.” RSA then told me
to lie down on the exam table, and I continued, “When I just, uh uh uh uh,
undress, my hip even hurt.”
After I lied down on my back, RSA used his arms to raise my legs straight
one by one, each once. RSA then asked, “You have any trouble feeling in
your leg?” I answered, “Yeah, on the on the on the soles.” RSA
interrupted and said, “I can’t look to your soles, because you have shoes
Because I have been further harmed during the diagnosis and treatment at the
two medical practices (New York Medical & Diagnostic Center; New York City
Medical & Neurological Offices, PC) referred and transferred to by my former
WC attorney’s law firm Bangel, Cohen & Falconetti, LLP, and some of these
harms are as intentional, malicious, and potential fatal, as the Jan. 16,
2018 fall I sustained at my workplace, I want to be as vigilant as possible
against any further harm veiled as diagnosis and/or treatment. Based on his
previous laundry of record review and the personal interaction so far, I was
so worried that Dr. RSA might do some harm out of my view. I raised my body
a little and found RSA was holding the needle of an open safety-pin. I said
, “You, you be careful, OK? I don’t want any kind of needle thing.” RSA
then turned to the rolling camera, showing the pin, and normally said, “…
You don’t want that. Ok, ok, all right.” I rested back. Then camera caught
that RSA quickly knocked a thick tuning-fork on and touched its handle on
my right shin’s ankle-end. I immediately complained of the severe pain. RSA
then said, “I am putting a vibrating fork on your leg.” Then the camera
caught that RSA briefly dampened the tuning-fork with his left-hand once or
twice, and tested the same way on my left shin counterpart. I answered his
general question of “Would you feel that?” with “Yeah”.
Then, RSA told me to sit up. Just as when I lied down, I used my arms to
help in the sitting-up. Apparently, RSA ignored that difficulty, as well as
the immediate continuous gasping when I just lied down on my back. I didn’t
expect him to feel the respiration pain, though. RSA now made his
announcement, “Thank you very very much. I’m really all done.” I
questioned, “So, that’s the, what, that’s called complete neurological
exam?” RSA responded with the polite words once again, “Thank you very
much.” By my record, this was ~One:Forty-One p.m.
Presenting the Two Printouts and Three CDs to Dr. RSA
After Dr. Robert S. April finished his five or six-minutes IME on me, he
went back to his computer in inner office. I, for the 3rd time, presented Dr
. RSA the two printout packs. RSA this time accepted them.
RSA: Thanks. You like (me) to take that?
RSA: That’s for me?
I: Yeah, yeah. That, that’s. I’m I’m asking, why they simply just change
RSA: Sim. I’m sorry, what?
I: Why they simply take the NECK off the …
RSA continues his: Why, why what?
I: that, why they simply take the NECK..
RSA interrupts: Simply, why they simply?
I scorn: Hmh, you’re just pretending. OK.
My daughter was asking me to tell her, so she would then tell Dr. RSA. I was
trying to ask Dr. Robert S. April why the IME vendor Brookside Consultants,
Inc., simply DELETED the NECK from the list of Established Injury Sites
shown on their previous three files in year 2018. Later in 2019, BCI’s two
similar files took NECK off, and added “post-concussion syndrome”, a
disease, in the list of Established Injury Sites, body sites. All five files
were never sent to me directly from any other parties, and all five files
are disguised as narrative reports from one of my treating doctors, Dr.
Mehrdad Golzad. Since RSA acted to avoid this topic, I continued to
directly talk to RSA about the other printout pack.
I: I hope on the on the trial, they would, other people…Other people would.
So, I just give you the my kind of, what, description of the injury and …
RSA stood and bent to read the top page of my statement about the fall and
recent symptoms, and used a pen or pencil to mark on that page, and said to
RSA: That’s your description?
I: Yeah, and, and, and the, and the…
RSA interrupts: Oh, thank you.
I: And the, the symptoms, and then about the old file…
RSA still looked at the SAME top page, and said: You wrote this?
I: I wrote that.
RSA: Ok, thank you.
Then, for the 2nd time, I brought up to RSA about giving him the diagnostic
images. There are total three CDs. The more detailed description of the CDs
’ content is at the beginning of this file. Briefly here, they carry the
once MRI on head, twice MRIs on cervical spine, once MRI on left-shoulder,
left-elbow, left-hand, lumbar spine, thoracic spine, and two sets of X-rays
on cervical spine, left-shoulder, and left-wrist. These diagnostic imaging
data spread sporadically across almost two years, referred by different
doctors/clinics, done at different clinic/radiology services. The datasets
have various problems on their own. Some important MRI images, such as the
ones on head and cervical spine, are not high-resolute enough, although the
MRIs were done on 3.0 Tesla machine. The facilities’ explanation is always
the patient moved during the MRI. The reality is I did NOT move during such
important MRI scans. Some referral note for MRIs was brushed aside by some
many parties, including the government agency NYS WCB, for months. As I
learned and found out by myself, some data were incomplete, such as the open
-mouth X-ray view for the C0-C2, due to my opponents’ deliberate vicious
actions. The referral notes and radiologists’ reports are directed to body
parts or etiologies predisposed for a washing-down or washing-clean for the
perpetrators or insurances. The problems of diagnostic imaging itself, from
the point of a referral doctor, doctor’s referral, prior authorization or
not, scan, to radiologist’s report, can be expanded into a book’s volume
to tell the DARK world. The DARK system wants to fool and torture victim
humans as foolish animals. Anyway, whatever available imaging data can tell
something, so the physicians can not shamelessly tell flat-out lies in front
of the people who know something. For the same reason, the deniers would
always seek to mess with or avoid diagnostic images.
I: Here, I give you the disks.
RSA: Oh, thank you, again. Those’re for me?
I: Uh, no, you have to, uh, to transfer…
RSA interrupts: I am not going to look at them now.
I: Uh, you just unload to your file…
RSA interrupts, and stresses word by word: I AM NOT GOING TO LOOK AT THEM
RSA interrupts: If you want to leave them for me, we will send back to you.
I: I don’t want to leave.
On April 04, 2019, I left a CD with the two sets of X-ray images scanned at
New York Medical & Diagnostic Center, to Dr. Albert S. Steinberger at
Metropolitan Neurosurgery, because Dr. ASS claimed that the CDs I brought in
for the Apr. 03, 2019 visit did not have any X-ray data. The X-ray data was
absolutely there. It took so many rounds of phone calls and humiliating
back-visits to just get that CD back. I do not want to repeat getting such
emotional trauma from such physicians again. The data copying from CDs can
be done in minutes, if Dr. RSA really wants the data. The diagnostic images
can be obtained by the IME requestors directly from the sources, if the IME
requestors really want to honor the data.
RSA interrupts: Then goodbye.
RSA: Goodbye. I don’t want them.
I: Why you don’t wa…
RSA interrupts: Because they’ll send them to me. [a short pause] Goodbye.
I: So, who will send them to you?
RSA: Good bye.
I: Who will send …
RSA interrupts and demands word by word: PLEASE LEAVE MY OFFICE, MY FRIEND.
I interrupt: No, because, because…
RSA interrupts: The examination is finished.
I: Because they say…
RSA: And I would like you to leave.
I: They say to bring…
RSA interrupts: I have. I’m sorry. You would carry on and rant and rave
whatever you want. But I don’t understand the word.
RSA never simply told me who are “they”, but would label my talk “rant
and rave”, and claim once again of no-understanding.
I: No, they, they say to leave the, they say to give this, the …
RSA: This is not. This is not part of the… Everything is given to me by the
organization that hired me.
I: They, they were s…
RSA interrupts: Thank you very much.
I: They were saying, for me to bring this to you.
I: For you to
RSA interrupts: I don’t know anything about it.
I: For you to, for you to review.
RSA: Then call your lawyer and have him speak.
I: I don’t have the so-called lawyer. I’m my own lawyer.
RSA: Go away from me, please.
I was only at the office door, several feet away from Dr. RSA. He was
seeming frustrated not to see me off, but I was really frustrated that he
would review the imaging data. If he reviews the imaging data, his
conscientiousness might say a tiny bit for me the injured worker and
claimant. I have recently learned on my own that the so-called medical
reports had already been washed-down or -clean from the very beginning.
My child was so inexperienced that she was still video-taping from the
corner, not covering Dr. RSA at all.
I to Child: Shooting here.
RSA probably thought the sentence a bit differently, and came out of his
inner office to the exam room and talks directly to the camera.
RSA: Please record me, and say that this is totally disruptive.
I: No. Why, why you don’t take the images.
RSA interrupts: I, I can’t. Nobody comes in this office and screams and
yells and makes no sense at all.
I: No. Why you don’t take this kind of data? Why you don’t take this data?
RSA interrupts: I’m going to leave this office. You do what you ever want.
And if you don’t get out soon, I have to take other mean. OK.
This was the 2nd open verbal threat Dr. Robert S. April said to me directly.
It’s about One:Forty-Three p.m.
I: I will just talk to the front desk to see about the, the, the, the thing.
Then, while I was stuttering with my child about the struggle, I prepared
for leaving the room.
Half a minute since he left the exam room, Dr. Robert S. April came back to
announce his 3rd open threat to me.
RSA: They’re making an announcement.
RSA: At the request of everybody in the office, I’m calling the police to
have you removed from here.
I rant here a little: I will, I will just to have that, to, to, to, to, uh,
try to give you the thing. You just try…You’re calling police. You call.
For the police, we’ll have the record too…They’re part of the murder.
I got clothes re-dressed and things packed, and my child and I left the exam
room. Joanna came to exam room’s door, soon after RSA made his
announcement. We left the exam room at ~One:Fifty p.m.
The Exiting Drama and the Physical Attack to Me (~1:50 - ~2:35 p.m.)
Joanna, my child and I were walking slowly down the pathway toward the front
desk. I talked to Joanna about leaving the diagnostic imaging data to Dr.
RSA, but Joanna somehow kept repeating I had to leave the disks behind, and
she told me to call Brookside about the CDs issue, but she followed
immediately on behalf of BCI by saying, “I don’t think Brookside is
understanding what you’re telling them.” While I emphasized that BCI told
me to bring the images, and the images are supposed to carry some primary
information about the injuries, Joanna first refused to copy the image data
to her front desk computer. After three and a half minutes of normal-manner
talk with her, Joanna then received the three CDs and said to load the data
to her computer. However, she claimed, “You can’t come back there though,
because there’re patient’s information back there.” So, I went to the
waiting area to sit and wait. About four minutes later, Joanna came over to
me to give back the three CDs, but said Dr. RSA didn’t want them. I felt
Then, I immediately, at ~One:Fifty-Eight p.m., called (866)455-3926 to
Brookside Consultants, Inc. about the diagnostic images issue. This second
call last two minutes and forty-two seconds, which was abruptly ended by an
Indian-looking man’s sudden and vicious assault on me. This mid-aged man
was from this Park Avenue Medical Professionals clinic, and later by online
search I identified him as Dr. Charles S. Saha. Kathy answered my phone, and
I was using the phone’s speaker for recording. My memory has been impaired
due to Jan. 16, 2018 fall, and I need to keep records, because some are
using all means to prey on me and my vulnerability. I know others do
recording on me too, although they don’t tell me.
Kathy: Good afternoon, Brookside. How can I help? This is Kathy. Can I help
I: Hello, this is Limin Wang, uh, I’m at here with uh the IME, uhm, at Dr.
uh Robert S. April’s clinic, uh…
Kathy interrupts: All right, but you you, have you left there? Because, I,
the doctor has called the police now, because…
I scorn: Huh, it’s a joke. It called police. I’m, I brought, I brought the
disk. I brought the disks, uh, uh, for the images of the MRIs and X-rays,
the mh front desk lady, front desk lady took my disk, uh, uh, uh, and then
after a moment passed back to me, saying that, still, Dr. uh uh April doesn
’t want to take uh uh the images from, from the disks. I, uh, so at least I
want to tell Brookside that I brought the, uhm, images here, and it’s…
Kathy interrupts: Right, you brought your images, but the doctor, the doctor
isn’t able to examine you today, because of …
Brookside Consults, Inc. and others are playing the orchestrated same plot
again, just like on IMEs at Dr. William B. Head, Jr. clinic. They fabricated
things to rile me the examinee, and then they blamed me for their cancelled
IME, and then the WCLJ didn’t allow me even a talk to straighten this kind
of “record” during the hearings. The corruption is as plain as this, at
the cost of me the victim. People intelligent enough or still enough can
judge the conversations on their own.
I interrupt: No, that, he was…
Kathy forces her continuation: everything that has happened.
I continue: he, he was saying, he was acting kind of a little bit to examine
me. He was acting a little bit to examine me, and then he rejected to take
the disks, uh, uh, uh, although I offered uh the disks uh to him, saying
there’re some MRI and X-ray data.
Kathy interrupts: Right, but if he is not examining you, he doesn’t want to
have your disks. So, you, he is returning those to you.
I interrupt: He wa, he WAS. Uh, uh, you got the update? He was doing a
little bit kind of exam, and then he called it over. And as you said, and as
he said, was say to call the POLICE. [I paused two seconds.] Is that a joke?
Kathy interrupts: Y, y, you’ve been, you’ve been very disruptive.
I interrupt: I brought…
Kathy continues: he’s telling me, and…
I interrupt: I was following, I was following the rule. I was following the
my rights. I’m supposed to be able to bring my family member for the visit,
but it’s just he was saying that I could not, uh, my family member could
not go in. That thing.
At this timepoint, probably exactly Two p.m., the Indian-looking male, later
known as Dr. Charles S. Saha, in plain dark shirt and pants, not without a
white coat, dashed out from the inside, and turned to my front, interrupting
me rudely but in low volume, “Who is that? Hey!”
I to CSS [I didn’t expect he would start the attack]: Hi.
Kathy: Well, they won’t allow your daughter in the room.
CSS demands, but still in low volume, most likely to avoid recording: You
have to answer. You have to stop the phone call.
While Charles S. Saha was demanding such, he started his assault on me. He
used his two hands to try to hang up my phone call, then used two hands to
twist my left hand and my phone. My phone was making some cracking sound.
Then his right hand went to hold my left wrist, frantically squeezing and
grating spots where the radial artery and the median nerve pass by. CLEARLY,
A PREMEDITATED AND ORCHESTRATED ATTACK WAS CARRIED OUT PROFESSIONALLY BY A
MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL. Later further things corroborate such conclusion.
During this attack, Kathy was still talking on the phone, and she should be
able to hear the assault on me.
Kathy continues: You haven’t allowed the interpreter. I told you I can’t
control …[The last part’s volume became very weak. And the phone itself
was somehow turned off during the struggle.]
I felt pain from the Indian assailant and groaned: Ow.
CSS acted as if he dominated: This is my. You have to stop the phone call.
At this instance, a woman screams: Oh, my god.
Because I raised my right leg and foot, and pushed the assailant at his
lower abdomen off me a few feet further. And I shouted at him, “STOP.”
Only this time, one person from this Park Avenue Medical Professionals
clinic probably really felt some concern for themselves. And only this time,
I really talked loudly, but for a single word.
Then, Dr. Charles S. Saha started to talk in normal volume: You need to
leave. You need to leave.
A woman polite voice, I dubbed her as WPV, said in clear and normal voice:
Wait. [Later, WPV was heard suggesting CSS to contact another doctor. I don
’t know her intention.]
I: You don’t. You see that, you see that.
WPV: Have to stop, have to stop.
WPV: Have enough.
The attack and counter then ended abruptly. Dr. Charles S. Saha didn’t do
anything further, quickly left the scene, and later probably didn’t say too
badly about me when the police arrived due to my 911 call. I didn’t get up
from the couch for revenge or anything.
While I was still sitting on couch, Joanna soon came over to me, coldly
urged me to simply leave, and claimed no attack on me or even my phone. They
are all professional on such events. Joanna wouldn’t even speak about the
assault on my body.
Joanna: We’re not trying to break your phone, Ok? There is no footage. Just
come, ok? Come, so we can just stop all this, come.
I strongly suspect that the waiting area has no security cameras under Park
Avenue Medical Professionals. Of course, these performers, including the
attacking physician Dr. Charles S. Saha, had noticed that my camera had been
packed away, not recording the video. My child is not socially experienced
yet to immediately start recording. “There is no footage” itself is
doubtable, and “there is no footage” does not equal to “there is no
assault”. The governing system, particularly the police, did nothing but to
urge me to leave the scene, as if I were a trespasser! The assailing side,
including Joanna, used “their property” as if a clinic were a private home
, and a patient on an appointment were an intruder! If I were the one who
attacked this way to any one of them, I could have been shot dead, and all
aspects of the system would have claimed “justice served”. It’s as polar
I reject: No, no.
Joanna: You’re not leaving?
I: I’ll call police. He doesn’t have the right.
Joanna: But he didn’t try to break your phone.
I: He ended my call, and tried to break my phone, then also try to uh, hurt,
hurt my, my wrist.
My younger teenage child, already eager to leave such complex matters to me
alone, had her immature secondary opinion: No, he was trying to take the
phone away from you.
I: No, he was also try to do the damage to my, to my wrist.
Joanna: Sir, but you realize this is their office, ok? You can’t. It’s
I called 911 for police, not for EMS. The 911 female receiver requested EMS
on the phone. The male EMS receiver somehow popped out his own words of “
headache” and “diarrhea” while neither the 911 female or I said any of
such word before on the phone. Answering the questions, I was only
complaining my left hand and left wrist had been attacked by an Indian-
looking mid-aged male in plain dark clothes coming from inside of this Park
Avenue Medical Professionals clinic. This call, my 3rd call in this clinic,
specifically in the waiting area, as before with the presence of zero or
only one other person seemingly a patient in the whole front area, last
about eight minutes, probably from ~Two:One to ~Two:Nine p.m.
Minutes after the call, at ~Two:Twelve p.m., two policemen came to the 2nd
floor clinic. Both look to be in their 30s. To me, the short officer looks
like an Amigo, and the tall one like an east Indian, and I would like to dub
them as Shoff and Toff, respectively, for this document. Toff immediately
told my daughter who was sitting next to me to stand up and go a few feet
away to talk with him. Shoff was asking me.
I explained, “I was coming here for twelve thirty IME appointment, with Dr.
uh uh Robert April.” Around this time, a flock of clinic personnel came
out to the area in front of the front desk, and Shoff said hi to them. When
I continued, “and then,” Shoff interrupted me, “Is that the doctor?” I
turned and found in the middle of a female flock the Indian-looking tall guy
now donned a white long coat. I answered, “No, m, uh, m, that’s the
doctor try to take my phone, and try to break my phone, and…” Shoff
interrupted again, “Which doctor?” I answered, “This doctor.” Shoff
repeated, “This doctor.” I confirmed, “Yeah.” Shoff then said, “All
right. Give me one second.” Shoff quickly went to ask that flock. Their
talking volume was low to my hearing, despite only probably three feet away.
Part of it went like below.
CSS: I ask him to stop the phone call.
CSS: Why? Because … very loudly…
Soon, Shoff: … no physical punch?
At some point of the crowd’s talk, Toff stopped asking my child, and joined
the crowd. Somebody in the flock was asking the police what happened to
their multiple 911 calls, and a policeman answered they were on their way. A
woman polite voice (PWV) asked Dr. CSS whether he needed to contact another
doctor, CSS said no, no, no. I suspect that PWV was thinking about some
claim. At some point, Toff asked the attacker and the flock, “What you
would like? What you want us to do?” A woman voice said something including
the word “outside”. Then, Shoff said, “All right, we will speak to him.
” Around this time, PWV said loud and clear, above all other talking noises
there, “Joanna, are excited now? OK?” Joanna burst into happy and loud
laughter in the front desk area. Their consensus on the victim was reached
after about two and a half minutes since the police entered the scene.
Then, Dr. Robert S. April came to the crowd, and put on his way to the
policemen, “Patient was sent from Brookside Consultant for legal
examination, because he is a plaintiff of a case against somebody he said,
he is treated him like a slave, and they destroyed him. I don’t like … I
examined him, but, when you got carried away, he wouldn’t leave because I
have to examine the CDs he have to… I say leave it if you want, I’ll look
it later.” The flock disappeared then.
Remember, the employer and TPA asked BCI to set up this IME, and for both
the original Nov. 14, 2019 and the re-scheduled Nov. 08, 2019 IME notices,
BCI demanded that I bring the diagnostic images for the IME. Now, RSA put it
as if I had unilaterally demanded him about this. I had visited other
clinics due to the Jan. 16, 2018 workplace injuries, and the clinics who
asked for the diagnostic images simply spent minutes downloading the files
from CDs to their computers. And because I had experienced a drama by
leaving a CD to Dr. ASS early this year, I don’t want to go through another
very probable nasty experience to get my CDs back.
Toff was then talking with RSA away from the crowd, and in a minute or so
came back, and talked loud and clear to me, “Here, this, this is the issue.
They don’t want you to use the phone here, because it has medical
equipment here that interfere with the, with the, with their, with their
signal here, so they want you to step out to make the phone call.” That’s
two fresh new things to me. The clinic had never said such signal
interference self-circuit to me, and why blamed me for their self-
interfering equipment. The clinic clearly wanted me to leave this PAMP
clinic for good, instead of to make my phone call outside. Later, Toff
multiple-times said directly to me, “You can’t use your cell phone”, “
they want you out of this office”, “they have no business with you”, etc.
I appreciate Shoff showed sufficient patience to me and pretty much allowed
me to present the events from my perspective, although Toff numerous times
loudly and abruptly interrupted my talk. Toff’s talk about signal
interference later flipped the direction a few times, i.e., my phone
interfered the medical equipment, or the medical equipment interfered my
During this stage of my talking with the two cops, at about Two:Eighteen p.m
., three EMS uniforms came into the clinic. Everybody saw and hi-ed
everybody. There were some indiscernible quick talks between police and EMS.
EMS said they came here for “head injury or something”, and police
answered it must be somebody else. Then Joanna and WPV were laughing
cheerfully in the front desk area. Then EMS headed directly inward to the
deep space. I paused to ask police whether that attacking doctor (Dr.
Charles S. Saha) was claiming he got head injury from his attack to me. Both
policemen concurrently repeated, “No, no, no.”
About a minute later, EMS came out to the exit area, and they talked to
police and me. I answered that my head injury was from workplace, and the
assault today to me at here was on my left wrist, left hand, and phone. A
male EMS briefly checked and said “no swelling,” etc. I figured their
suggestion of a hospital X-ray on my wrist and hand would not do any further
service. Although I said, “I really don’t know how to deal with legal
matters, uhm, uhm, in the right ways,” and EMS said I could go to hospital
now or later because of this, I chose not to go with them then. Seven
minutes after EMS’ arrival, at ~Two:Twenty-Five p.m., police and I
appreciated EMS’s arrival, and EMS departed the scene.
Then, during the last eight minutes of talk between police and I, Dr. RSA
came out to the pathway to talk to Toff, who was talking in a loud voice to
me, but I assume that’s Toff’s volume of working talk. Nobody from the
clinic complained to Toff about his volume. Toff then went in to talk with
RSA, and Shoff listened to me about today’s happenings and my difficulties
in this workers’ compensation case. Two minutes later, Toff came back with
new points, saying to me, “I talked to the doctor. This is how it works.
They will examine your CD, Ok?” “And they are going to report to the
company. They can’t report to you because, uh, you are suing the company,
for, for, for you, for your workers’ comp, right?” Note, if this’s what
RSA said, then he was lying to police too. Workers’ Compensation case is
not a lawsuit, not even a compensation case directly against the employer
company unless the company is self-insuring Workers’ Comp. I learn some
basic things by myself after the Jan. 16, 2018 injuries. Many other parties
deliberately fool and prey on victims, particularly unknowledgeable victims.
Toff continued, “The doctor doesn’t work for you. The doctor works for
the company.” and “He examine you, he, all the findings, all the video, he
reports to the company, and the company reports to your lawyer, and the
lawyer will inform you…” I don’t know what’s the real purpose of such “
education,” which was not a point of the prior arguments at all. Anyway, I
answered, “I don’t have a lawyer. I had a lawyer before, but the lawyer
didn’t work for me.” Toff quickly answered, “Ok, then the company will
directly contact you.” It’s very confusing about the specific identity of
“the company” in Toff’s talk. My employer company B.Q. Wide, at least by
its superficial name, is not the same IME vendor company Brookside
Consultants, Inc., at least by its superficial name.
Then Toff said, “The doctor has the disks.” I said RSA didn’t take the
disks or the data, and I would like to wait a little further for the doctor
to copy the data to his computer and then for me to take the CDs home with
me. Toff quickly interrupted me, making another fresh new point, “As I said
, he has a lot of patients, so he isn’t having time right now, so, like I
said.” I don’t know the source of this. For my whole two hours (from ~12:
30 to ~2:35 p.m.) in this clinic, I only occasionally saw one individual,
probably a patient, briefly in the waiting area. Dr. Robert S. April
multiple times said to me that he’s leaving there with either no IME on me
or no diagnostic images review for me, but later claimed in his “objective
findings” report that he worked on another patient during the falsified “
12 to 3:30 p.m.” IME on me. Either Dr. RSA works on his patient by seconds
or a minute, or that’s a blatant lie, and by business, a fraud. At least, I
didn’t witness his interaction of whatsoever with another patient when I
was physically at that clinic.
Next, when I told police that Dr. RSA in the beginning didn’t allow my
family member in for the IME on me and slammed the door shut at us, Toff
interrupted, “Yeah, because, they, they don’t report to you.” Soon, Toff
suggested to me, “Like I said, this is all civil issues. It has nothing to
do with us. So, you have to get a lawyer, or contact your company to see
what they want to do?” Then it went to my last attempt to give the imaging
data to Dr. RSA. The cycle went futile again, as I added that the front-desk
Joanna took the CDs but returned them to me with saying Dr. RSA didn’t
want them. Eventually, it’s clear that police wouldn’t bring any charge
against my attacker Dr. Charles S. Saha or persuade Dr. Robert S. April or
his staff to copy the data. And it’s clear that the only choice is for me
to leave, without leaving my CDs behind for the sham IME review. The whole
procedure has proved to be a sham, and Dr. Robert S. April’s following “
objective findings” IME report proves to be a shame.
Part 2. My Rebuttal to Dr. Robert S. April’s Nov. 08, 2019 IME Report
In Dr. Robert S. April’s report of the Nov. 08, 2019 event, many actual
things, temporal sequences, causal relationships have been either distorted
or deleted, and many of their either hallucinated or fabricated items are
included. The effects of such efforts to falsify some facts and create some
“objective” findings under the name of a medical professional are not only
to intentionally deplete the probability of rescuing my life from serious
central nervous system injuries, but also to viciously paint me a “
In Part 1, I have truthfully presented the wholesome account of what had
happened during the Nov. 08, 2019 IME visit to Dr. Robert S. April at 120 E.
86th St. 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10028. Now, I’d like to repudiate Dr. RSA
’s report page by page, paragraph by paragraph, sentence by sentence, and
point by point.
IME-4 (5-18) form filled and signed by Robert April, M.D. claimed the Start
Time and End Time of Patient Examination to be 12:00 and 3:30, respectively.
The simple fact of time and duration can not even be stated true by Dr. RSA
. My child and I entered the clinic at ~12:25 p.m. and left with the two
policemen at ~2:35 p.m. Dr. RSA exaggerated by about 1.5 hrs, i.e. by ~70%
more. It states Dr. RSA is hired by the IME vendor Brookside Consultants,
RSA Report p. 1, par. 2 reads:
“This examination was scheduled for 12:00 pm today in my office at 120 East
86th Street, New York, NY 10028. The claimant arrived on time with his
daughter and an interpreter. However, he claimed that he did not need the
services of an interpreter and that he spoke perfect English. He then
proceeded to carry on loudly, disrupting the office and causing great
consternation on the part of office staff and other patients. He harangued
me and members of the office staff by shouting in a loud, disruptive voice,
often acting in a threatening fashion that was frightening to all concerned.
He did not leave my office until 3:30 p.m. during which period, of 3 ½
hours there were several different interactions, intermixed with periods in
which he went back to the waiting room to go through more documents or to
write more information on the Claimant Intake Form. In all, several attempts
were made to begin the examination in my office, but were interrupted by
his refusing to continue the examination in the usual fashion. He had one
objection after another. He made one demand after another in order to carry
on in his own fashion without agreeing to sit down and answer my questions
in an orderly, systematic fashion. He then dismissed the interpreter. I made
several calls to your office and was instructed to carry on to the best of
my ability and to describe the interaction that transpired in as much detail
My repudiation to RSA Report p. 1, par. 2:
The IME was re-scheduled from Nov. 14, 2019 10:30 a.m. to Nov. 08, 2019, 12:
30 p.m. BCI’s page of IME report distribution once again states the
appointment was 12:30 p.m. My child and I arrived at the 2nd floor clinic
Park Avenue Medical Professionals at ~12:25 p.m. The interpreter, a total
stranger to us, was waiting inside the clinic. I never asked for an
interpreter for medical visits. BCI and my other opponents imposed the
interpreter for their own purposes. Personally, the interpreter behaved as a
quite modest lady, and I feel sorry for her to be in the wrong place. I
never claimed that I spoke perfect English. I did say when I needed an
interpreter such as at WC hearings, WCB wouldn’t provide, and some would
talk the ways so I had tremendous difficult in hearing and/or understanding.
The clinic itself is like a circus, many times they flocking together,
talking loudly, laughing loudly, gossiping loudly about me. For example,
before Dr. RSA’s slamming the door to me and my child to start the problems
, I was filling in the Questionnaire, there was a woman talking and laughing
loudly, and I didn’t hear anybody to stop her. I was talking at my normal
volume as I talk at home after the Jan. 16, 2018 injuries. I never
threatened any of them. They actually threatened me many times and
physically assaulted me once. Dr. RSA put out many demands, some against the
IME rules, to start many difficulties, and then he and Joanna of course
never wanted to help on these difficulties. I didn’t see or hear they
placed a call to BCI about any issue. When talking, I was seriously
answering their questions, but Dr. RSA and others often avoided my questions
by using various tricks, such as by claiming “not understand”. It’s
ridiculous to use and blame “consternation”, “harangued”, “threatening
” on me. My child and I left the clinic for good with the police at ~2:35 p
.m., and there was only slightly over 2 hours altogether at the clinic. Dr.
RSA himself came out multiple times, including the first two times to talk
to me while I was filling in the Questionnaire once and for all. I didn’t
review or write any “document” there. I went back to the front desk once
to address the denying-right issue, because RSA falsely claimed my child can
not go in together with me for my IME and then slammed his door shut. I
stayed in the waiting room a second time, because of their refusing-images-
data issue and their physical assault on me. After RSA multiple times said
no IME because of his rules or demands, Dr. RSA’s IME went hastily and
continuously for about only FIVE minutes. Anything Dr. RSA may claim as I “
not cooperate” or he “not understand”. Dr. RSA NEVER asked questions or
examined in “an orderly, systemic fashion.” It’s the diagonal opposite.
The interpreter was NEVER into the exam room during the IME, because of my
objection, despite of their imposition. I heard incoming calls to Dr. RSA,
after I called BCI. I never saw or heard RSA or Joanna placed any call to
BCI. My opponents conspired in the very beginning to CANCEL the IME and to
RSA Report, p. 2, par. 1 writes,
“I attempted several times to get the examination under way, but he
insisted first on setting up a video stand and camera for purposes of
recording the examination. This required a certain amount of time when I
could not use my examining room for other patients, so I allowed him to
proceed while I did work in another examining room. He finally did agree,
after much resistance, to take off his shirt and pants for the examination,
but would not remove his shoes because he claimed that my floor was dirty
and that I should have provided slippers. He wanted to direct all aspects of
this examination himself. Therefore, it took more than one hour of effort
to convince him, once the video equipment was in place, to take off his
clothes, put on an examining gown, and permit me to proceed to examine him.
During that period of time, he shouted loudly at me, disrupted the office
and caused much concern on the part of my colleagues who were seeing their
patients and office personnel who were frightened of him. I asked to call
his attorney but was told that he was his own attorney and that he did not
have an attorney. He continued to harangue me, accused me of mistreatment
and made several, unintelligible remarks. I finally did examine him (see
below), but after the examination he would not leave this office, insisting
that I look at the three CDs he brought to the examination. Eventually, my
office administrator called the New York City Police Department to enforce
the claimant’s leaving this office. He was told that if were willing to
leave the CD in this office, it would be read in due time and returned to
him. He finally decided to take the CD with him and left the office with the
police officers, at 3:30 pm. In summary, his behavior was inappropriate,
bellicose, menacing, and his claims and comments were difficult to
understand. His written comments contained distorted, strangely constructed
sentences – please see the papers enclosed. These statements exemplify the
psychotic, fantasied nature of his complaints with minutely detailed
expressions of self-abnegation, anger, and paranoia.”
My repudiation to RSA Report p. 2, par. 1:
Dr. RSA attempted many times to cancel the IME, and made many demands on the
possible IME. When my child and I were finally allowed in his exam room, Dr
. RSA was sitting in his inner office working on his computer. During the
whole approximate twenty-two minutes when I stayed in the exam room, Dr. RSA
only exited his office twice, and each time he stayed out for less than a
minute and then came back into his inner closet-sized no-extra-door office.
It’s impossible for him to meaningfully work on other patients during such
short times. He twice exited to threaten calling police. There was no
disagreement between RSA and me about setting up the tripod and camera. It
took only four minutes for the ditched mounting and packing-back. I had
resistance to his adamant demand on me to undress my inner loose layer too.
It took only about seven minutes for me to yield to that demand and get
ready with underwear only and gown. It’s completely fraudulent for Dr. RSA
to state, “Therefore, it took more than one hour of effort to convince him,
once the video equipment was in place, to take off his clothes, put on an
examining gown, and permit me to proceed to examine him.” and “During that
period of time, he shouted loudly at me, disrupted the office and caused
much concern on the part of my colleagues who were seeing their patients and
the office personnel who were frightened of him.” There were almost zero
other patients seen in the waiting area, and the clinic personnel all talked
and acted as if everything were under their wanton control. They even
carried out a physical assault on me by a plain-clothed young doctor. The
distorting statements in Dr. RSA’s report “exemplify the psychotic,
fantasied nature of ” this report and the “inappropriate, bellicose,
menacing” personnel in that clinic “with minutely detailed expressions of
self-abnegation, anger, and paranoia.” The transcript clearly showed I only
asked whether RSA could provide slippers, and RSA readily agreed to let me
keep my shoes on. RSA put on many demands about IME, and he carried out the
five-minute IME his way. I only questioned whether the deep tendon reflex on
the knees was done right and cautioned him when he was about to use the
needle of an open safety pin on me. When RSA asked me, I seriously answered
and he absolutely understood. When RSA falsely claimed no understanding at
some point, I tried to repeat, to say another way, to let my child say to
him, or to present him my printouts. As copied ahead, IME vendor BCI demands
me about diagnostic images for the IME review. RSA said multiple times to
leave there without an IME on me. While RSA falsely claimed in the report
the visit last until 3:30 p.m., he actually wouldn’t spend any minutes
reviewing or downloading the images from CDs. The opponents know many of my
humiliating struggles with them, such as the CD of X-ray images left for Dr.
ASS, and the CD from NYMDC crashed my old computer to no MBR (master boot
record). Dr. RSA was supposed to be busy in the right way with me about the
scheduled IME, including about the imaging data, but he wanted to create
difficulties and pain for me. I called for police about the CSS assault on
me, and police arrived after my call. Although police urged me to simple
leave there without any charge on the assailant or any help to me, I was not
the one leaving with shame or crime. Although RSA report claims, “His
written comments contained distorted, strangely constructed sentences –
please see the papers enclosed.”, I write about the facts, the truth, the
feeling, etc, and some people may well understand.
RSA Report p. 2, par. 2 writes,
“He spoke directly to me, but his speech was run-on, monotonous,
monoprosodic, and totally unintelligible. I explained to him that that was
the reason an interpreter was needed and his response was “I do not
understand you either.”
My Repudiation to RSA Report p. 2, par. 2:
Much of the talk between different people and me was transcribed in Part 1.
Although at some points, some people claim that they do not understand my
spoken English, they actually would not like me to talk any language to
anybody about anything at all. The head injury has impaired my speech too. I
partially appreciate the RSA report pointed out some of my speech problems.
As I recall, the treating doctors have not mentioned such impairment at all
, just about many other damages. Still, under this kind of ruthlessly
irresponsible sham system, an available treating doctor may be a little
better than no treating doctor available at all. The government agency WCB
officials would simply jump to decision of “no medical evidence” without
accepting the factors of “why no medical evidence”, leave alone
RSA Report p. 2, par. 3 writes,
“He provided no information whatsoever about his symptoms today. He stated
that all of the information was included on the written documents that he
presented to me. His Claimant Intake form described his accident as a fall
from a stepladder at work with injuries to his head, neck, left arm, back,
left leg and spread to cause “tetraplegia”. The questionnaire claimed that
he was taking Boswellia, Fioricet, Topiramate, rizatriptan, celecoxib,
magnesium oxide, baclofen, Voltaren, and gabapentin. He claimed that the
treating doctors said that there was no fracture, but they prevented him
from having an MRI or x-ray service or data. He then went on to say that he
rejected all their opinions because they are not truthful to his injury. He
finally stated “do not go other blames. I was healthy before the January 16
, 2018, injury and working hard. Since the January 16, 2018, injury, the
neck and back problem intractable to me.” His pain diagram was one
characteristic of psychotic patients. It too is enclosed.”
My Repudiation to RSA Report p. 2, par. 3:
I am confused about the meaning of “He provided no information whatsoever
about his symptoms today.” It may just be an evidence of how irresponsible
an IME report of “objective findings” by a medical profession can be. The
two printout packs I gave to Dr. RSA directly in his office are 1) my Aug.
07, 2019 version statement of the slavery workload, the fall, the aftermath,
and the recent symptoms; 2) the three IME files from Brookside Consultants,
Inc., each two pages, of year 2018, all showing Neck included in the
Established Injury Sites. These three BCI files, like the two other BCI
files of y-2019, are all falsely listed as Medical Narrative of one of my
treating doctors, Dr. Mehrdad Golzad. None of these five files has been
served by any party until I came upon to them in the WCB eCase folder. The
two printouts were not included in BCI’s RSA report copy to me or to the
WCB, although RSA report writes, “He stated that all of the information was
included on the written documents that he presented to me.” Who and why
hid the two printout packs? On the Questionnaire, my original answers are “
warehouse hard laborer, fell off a meticulously tampered 8-ft stepladder at
work”, “head, neck, left upper extremity, back, left lower extremity at
the date of injury, but it spread to tetraplegia!!!”, “The tampered broken
8-ft ladder was left at the particular site almost exclusively for me the
newly rotated worker to use. During the fall, I fell from ~8ft above my feet
, the ladder was tilting. I reached to grab the shelf. My body had a
vertical acceleration-deceleration, whiplash, 180-degree rotation, sideway
jerk. The details of the worksite injury are described in the attached files
during this visit.”, “a hard laborer slave, paid by work minutes at
minimum legal wage by minute.”, “headache, dizziness, tetraplegia, pain
allover my body everyday, including NECK. Exacerbated by daily minimum
activities. Bothered sleep too.”, “New York Medical & Diagnostic Center
wanted to inject things to my neck. I rejected that because they are not
truthful to my injury, and else.”, “See the multiple-paged attachment file
for the full details. Briefly, serious head trauma and tetraplegia, and the
sequelae affect the whole body and multiple vital systems, including
nervous, heart, respiratory, reproductive, musculoskeletal, digestive,
urination, etc. The vision, hearing, smelling, tasting are affected too.”
The RSA report purposefully helps the deniers by leaving a lot of important
info out, and by distorting some of my original statements with sentences
like “He then went on to say that he rejected all their opinions.” It’s a
serious verbal assault to me by his statement of “His pain diagram was one
characteristic of psychotic patients.” As my counter, such IME report is
one characteristic of a psychotic psychiatrist.
Let’s read carefully the printed RSA statement at the end of the RSA
Questionnaire asking for my signature, “This examination is directed only
to the injuries sustained in my accident. I understand the examination is
being performed by a physician other than my own treating physician, and
that no doctor/patient relationship exists. No questions concerning
diagnosis or treatment will be answered.” If so, what such IME is
responsible for? Isn’t it a sickening joke? The IME is only for
irresponsibly washing the perpetrators’ responsibility away, under the
cover of professionals? The Questionnaire also asks about “all unrelated
medical conditions” and “prior” “accidents”, “injuries”, “problems”
, “operations”, for alternatives.
RSA Report p. 5, par. 2 to p.6, par. 1 writes,
“NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION IN THIS OFFICE: The claimant was 5 ft 8 in tall,
about 140 lbs, and had a BP of 110/80, PR of 80, R of 12. He was agitated,
moved about and spoked loudly, shouting about documents that he thrust into
the examiner’s face but showed no signs of limitation of movement or any
physical limitation or distress. He moved about continuously, used both arms
and hands equally and with normal dexterity and wrote lengthy commentaries
on the intake sheets, muttering loudly all the time, and disrupting the
waiting room. He simply never sat still and quietly. He continued to
complain during each aspect of my examination to the effect that I was not
doing it right. He claimed that my deep tendon reflex examination did not
strike him in the right part of his limb and that I was not truthful, and
that I was trying to hurt him. He would not take off his shoes because he
claimed that I did not have slippers to protect him from germs on the floor.
He finally did take off his outer clothes and put on the examining room so
that I did examine him in his underwear. When he finally took off his
clothes to put on the examining gown, he was able to do this standing, used
both arms, had no trouble lifting them above his head and moved with
coordination and normally rapid, or very fast, speed. There were no external
signs of injury.”
My Repudiation to RSA Report p. 5, par. 2 to p.6, par. 1:
It’s so disgusting to read such a grossly fabricated and twisted story
authored by a physician Dr. Robert S. April in specialty of neurology and
psychiatry. His staff never did any vitals on me. My height and weight were
reported by me on the Questionnaire. As I have described the details of how
RSA was rushing through the five-minutes IME, the “objective findings”
about the other three vitals (BP, PR, R) should each carry a BIG question
mark. Dr. Robert S. April didn’t even do the blood pressure measurement
with the traditional mercury-column sphygmomanometer right, and never used
his stethoscope during the BP measurement. RSA never used any timing device
during a possible pulse rate measurement, and RSA never used the stethoscope
to hear my lung respiration. RSA probably intentionally ignored the
observance of my gasping when I simply lied down on my back on the exam
table from a sitting position. Yet, such seemingly normal numbers come out
from Dr. Robert S. April’s mind. Why aren’t these simple numbers even “
subjective” from an IME doctor? The rest of his p. 5, par. 2 to p. 6, par.
1 is the continuation of his typical “findings” which Dr. RSA claims to
be “objective”. It is so ludicrous. I was riled BY them, mainly by Dr. RSA
, and later physically attacked by Dr. Charles S. Saha. They were the causes
, and they would expect me to sustain the whole rudeness and brutality with
just silence and docility? The handwritten short answers to Dr. RSA
Questionnaire were “lengthy commentaries”??? When I was sitting on the
couch, either filling in the Questionnaire or talking to the police, I was
either quiet or talking in a normal volume. RSA may tend to claim all my
talk or interaction with him and all other personnel in that PAMP clinic as
“loudly” or “thrust into”, his subjective hyperbole goes beyond the
limit of “a report that differs substantially from my professional opinion
” he signed for the IME report, by writing “moved about continuously”, “
muttering loudly all the time”, “He simply never sat still and quietly.”,
etc. Dr. RSA report falsely blames his sham exam as my fault, by stating,
“He continued to complain during each aspect of my examination to the
effect that I was not doing it right.” Dr. RSA’s deep tendon reflex test,
particularly on my knees, was questionable, and I cautioned him not to hurt
me if he uses a needle-like thing. I have never said that Dr. RSA was trying
to physically hurt me or have physically hurt me, although I was physically
or physiologically hurt by some other doctors. I only asked whether
slippers would be available. Dr. RSA said no, and then easily agreed for me
to keep my shoes on. No talk about “germs” or “floor” at all. I took off
my coat and jacket already before I asked him to start the exam, and then I
readily agreed to take off my outer pants too. I had disagreement to his
adamant demand of removing the inner loose layer, and I eventually yielded
to that demand which later turned out to be unnecessary for his whole IME.
The dispute about taking off the inner loose layer took three or four
minutes at the most. I don’t know how the following sentence is constructed
or construed, “He finally did take off his outer clothes and put on the
examining room so that I did examine him in his underwear.” I did not put
on the examining “room”, and I was examined in my underwear and a medical
gown. I still can live, still can move, still can speak, still can write, as
so many patients or elder people still can, but I have been seriously
injured, and injured to the central nervous system which controls the whole
body. Simple sitting-up, standing, or walking can quickly aggravate the
whole set of symptoms. Absolutely, there are external signs of injury: MY
FACE’S UPPER PART OFTEN SHOWS CYANOSIS, RACCOON EYES, AND BROAD AREA
SPECKLES, BIG DIMPLES AND GROOVES SHOW UP ON MY FACE TOO, AFTER THE JAN. 16,
2018 FALL. I never looked like this before the injury. I am only in my mid-
RSA Report p. 6, par. 2 writes,
“He first objected to my examination with a loud voice that was heard
throughout the office beyond the confines of the examining room. He insisted
that his daughter videotape everything that was done and continuously
referred to “my rights” at every aspect of this examination. Please note
that I attempted to speak to him as little as possible because I could not
understand his responses to me. He refused to use an interpreter.”
My Repudiation to RSA Report p. 6, par. 2:
Much of the talk has been transcribed in Part 1, and it’s highly possible
for “independent” people to tell who is the liar. The RSA report here
claims “I attempted to speak to him as little as possible” and uses “I
could not understand his responses to me” as a “reason”. Just three
During Dr. RSA’s rejection to take the diagnostic imaging data,
I: They were saying, for me to bring this to you.
During Dr. RSA’s failed blood pressure measurement on me,
RSA: You have high blood pressure?
I [cool]: I think some doctors claim that way.
RSA: I see.
During his 3rd open threat to me, instead of saying “as little as possible
” like “cops coming”,
RSA: They’re making an announcement. At the request of everybody in the
office, I’m calling the police to have you removed from here.
My only loud voice was on a simple word, “STOP”, to the assailant Dr.
Charles S. Saha. That word might be “heard throughout the office beyond the
confines”, and it was uttered outside of the exam room and after the sham
exam. BEFORE Dr. RSA eventually honored my right of being accompanied and to
videotape during the IME, I needed to talk many times to them about my
right. They all acted as if they never knew the existence of others’ right.
There’s no need of an interpreter in IME, but I have requested an
interpreter for every of the many WCB hearings in case they talk at low
volume, fast speed, with slangs, jargons, codes, and accent, and I am not
allowed to talk much. The WCB hearings only one time granted me the
interpretation, and it’s a tele-interpreter, and I was not allowed to talk
in English then, and the interpretation was very lousy.
RSA Report p. 6, par. 3 writes,
“CRANIAL NERVES: II -XII: He appeared to hear normally and to see normally
judging by his behavior, his handwriting, and his responses to my requests.
Ocular movements were full in all directions of gaze without diplopia or
nystagmus. Facial movements and eye blink/closure were symmetrical and
normal. Voice production normal. Respiratory dynamics unremarkable. Tongue
was non fibrillatory and he protruded it for me in the midline. Neck
movements were unlimited during spontaneous movements.”
My Repudiation to RSA Report p. 6, par. 3:
That paragraph is another showcase of Dr. Robert S. April’s distorted,
fabricated and hallucinated “objective findings”. What happens to cranial
nerve I? Here, RSA flopped to claim everything is normal of me, although my
smelling, seeing, hearing, tasting, feeling, and other senses have
definitely impaired by the traumatic injuries. When Dr. RSA asked me to look
upward to his moving index finger, why RSA accused me with “so you are not
cooperating” and reported here “Ocular movements were full in all
directions of gaze without diplopia or nystagmus”? I was raising my eyelids
to stare. Check my whole account of his total five-minutes IME, what Dr.
RSA did to test diplopia or nystagmus? He didn’t say much other than
accusing me while testing my eyes. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING was performed by Dr.
Robert S. April to test my facial movements, eye blink/closure, voice
production, respiratory dynamics, or tongue, but a psychotic psychiatrist
came up with all normal, and included such a psychotic sentence, “Tongue
was not fibrillatory and he protruded it for me in the midline.” For the
neck movement, Dr. Robert S. April only tested the PASSIVE neck flexion,
left rotation; when I complained pain, he let his hands off my head, and
used his index finger to direct a spontaneous right rotation of my neck. No
other neck moves, and no goniometer for anything. My neck movements have
certainly been limited due to the Jan. 16, 2018 fall schemed on me by
workplace B.Q. Wide and the malicious assaults veiled at treatments to me at
New York Medical & Diagnostic Center. Certain movements of my neck such as
extension or flexion aggravate the headache, dizziness, and many other
RSA Report p. 6, par. 4 writes,
“MOTOR EXAMINATION: Motor power could not tested because he would not
cooperate. There was no atrophy to inspection, and I measured circumferences
of this forearms and his legs which were equal. There was no problem with
the gait and stance. He would not follow my command to walk tandem and/or on
heels and toes. Tremor and rigidity were absent. All reflexes were present
in upper and lower limbs (including triceps, biceps, periosteal, patellar
and Achilles reflexes). Babinski sign was absent. Romberg sign was absent.”
My Repudiation to RSA Report p. 6, par. 4:
That is another paragraph of Dr. Robert S. April’s distorted, fabricated
and hallucinated “objective findings”. I was following on Dr. RSA’s exam
on me. Dr. RSA didn’t test my momentary motor strength, but he had the
cheek to accuse me again of “because he would not cooperate.” The atrophy
is even shown on my facial muscles, but the “medical professionals”,
including Dr. Robert S. April, intentionally chose to ignore. Such “medical
professionals”, to my observance, only work for themselves and their
masters, not for the patients. He did the sham measurement of circumference
on my LOWER legs, and after interposition with some other hasty moves, on my
UPPER arms. The tape measure was seen diagonally dangling on my left upper
arm, and tight on my right upper arm. Now, please examine carefully Dr. RSA
’s written statement, “I measured circumferences of this forearms and his
legs which were equal.” He stated “this forearms”. Also, his statement
claims that the circumference of my forearms is equal to that of my legs. I
think a standing biting dog can even see that is categorically false. I find
my gait and balance problematic due to the injuries, although I am not
complete paralyzed YET. Dr. RSA never uttered his “command” for me “to
walk tandem and/or on heels and toes.” There are tremor and rigidity on me,
although not severe. For example, after standing for a while, the tremor
and rigidity become obvious. The spine has become a lot less flexible. As
described in Part 1, Dr. RSA only tapped on my knees (left knee cap, right
knee tendon), elbow interior bends, radii near the wrists. No or little
reflex except the jerk when tapped on my right forearm. Other “objective
findings” such as “triceps…and Achilles reflexes”, “Babinski sign was
absent”, “Romberg sign was absent” were all “subjectively found” by Dr.
Robert S. April’s head and fingers.
RSA Report p. 6, par. 5 writes,
“MECHANICAL EXAM: Straight leg raising was normal to 70 (normal
range is painless elevation to 60-90). The range of motion
of the low back was normal (60 flexion, 45 lateral rotation
to either side and 25 lateral flexion to either side). The claimant
was able to lie down and then sit up. Percussion and palpation of vertebral
column and paraspinal muscles were negative for spasm or tenderness. There
was no Tinel sign or other signs of carpal tunnel syndrome. All range of
motion measurements were done with reference to an orthopedic goniometer as
per the 5th Edition of the AMA Guidelines.”
My Repudiation to RSA Report p. 6, par. 5:
Time and time again, I need to outcry the system is a sham and shame,
because it is. Dr. Robert S. April NEVER used an “orthopedic goniometer”
during the whole five-minutes IME. Probably, he had made such fraudulent
reports and got away with nice pays by such a system. Here, Dr. RSA
fabricated a bunch of numbers again to falsely report my ROM as normal. For
the passive straight leg raising, it might be to 40 or 50
and he didn’t ask anything during his maneuver. At some point of the IME,
RSA suddenly asked “where is the pain”, I answered “pain all over”. Don
’t expect me to complain pain all the time to him, although many pains are
constant or multiple times daily. My active flexion of spine has become
significantly restricted, when compared to pre-injury. The lateral rotation
and lateral flexion to either side were all hastily forced by RSA. I am
still able to lie down and sit up, usually with the help of arms, but a lot
weaker than pre-injury. Dr. RSA NEVER did any “percussion and palpation of
vertebral column and paraspinal muscles”. The video showed his left hand
only quickly glided over my upper back once, but I never felt that touch. IF
Dr. RSA HAD EVER PALPATED MY NECK, HE WOULD HAVE FOUND PROBLEMS. DR. Robert
S. April did not do any test about carpal tunnel syndrome or its like. The
vibrating tuning fork RSA suddenly put on my lower shin caused immediate
extra pain, which should be a Tinel sign, but Dr. RSA once again laundries
in his written IME report, “There was no Tinel sign.” Sarcastically, the
assailant Dr. Charles S. Saha did the Tinel or CTS test, and it’s an
RSA Report p. 6, par. 6 writes,
“SENSORY EXAMINATION: He would not permit me to touch him with a safety pin
. When he saw it, he looked frightened and began to object vociferously and
withdrew from my examination, threatening me if I were to touch him with it.
He felt a vibrating tuning fork (512 Hz) normally.”
My Repudiation to RSA Report p. 6, par. 6:
I had suffered malicious assaults veiled as diagnosis or treatment by
treating medical professionals due to the Jan. 16, 2018 fall. I suspected Dr
. RSA might do some harm too out of my view. I CAUTIONED him if he really
needed to use a needle-like thing on me. I never intended or showed
threatening to him. It’s only his own false feeling. I did feel the
vibrating tuning fork put on my shins’ lower ends, but I felt extra pain
too. It should be a Tinel sign, but Dr. RSA reports as “normally”. So,
only one test of only one sensation at only one pair of spots was done, and
Part. 3. My Response to Dr. RSA’s 2nd Review of Documents
I was not served a copy of the documents Dr. RSA had reviewed for the 1st
time or for the 2nd time. No document ID# was included in Dr. RSA’s reports
, and some documents in the WCB eCase folder may be different versions of
the filing about the same matter or medical service or anything. Thus, for
the “chart” and “documents” selectively picked by my opponent parties
for Dr. RSA’s review, I am more or less unsure of the EXACT content and
quality. My 2nd round repudiation would then be on whatever I found out to
be downright wrong or false. Note, I am not a medical professional, not a
lawyer, and I have not known many things yet. Also, the documents in the
eCase fold are too much for me to process under my circumstances. Writing a
response to this RSA IME report has already been a crushing load to me. So
please understand, MY CURRENT RESPONSES to DOCUMENTS MAY BE VERY LIMITED IN
DEPTH AND BREADTH.
RSA Report p. 1, par. 1 writes, “I would first draw your attention to my
prior report of September 17, 2019, in this matter. I wrote a review of the
above-named claimant’s chart and concluded that there was no clinical
indication for the C-4 authorization request by Dr. Golzad for additional
balance and vestibular therapy. I based that conclusion wholly on my review
of 15 tabulated documents that were sent to me at that time. Some are
included again in my new review of documents (below) that are part of the
present neurological Workers Compensation examination.”
My first rebuttal to Dr. RSA’s first laundry report has been served to the
WCB and my opponent parties. No matter only “15 tabulated documents” or
how many more documents Dr. RSA reviewed in the 1st or 2nd round, his
starting point and direction determine his review outcome to be biased
against me. Both review outcomes from Dr. Robert S. April are as biased as a
grave fraud against me. His first review “educated” the wrong idea about
standard head trauma diagnosis protocol. His second review demonstrates his
malicious intention to mislead whoever has a genuine interest in fighting
justice, truth and life for me the injured victim. Many simple specifics,
such as dates, could not even be correctly copied, or were deliberately
falsified by Dr. Robert S. April. Such phenomenon showed once again in this
Nov/08/2019 laundry report’s section “REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS”. THEREFORE, DR
. ROBERT S. APRIL’S REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS
EQUIVALENT TO THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS, BUT SHOULD BE TREATED AS EVIDENCE OF
Dr.RSA’S OR HIS UPSTREAM’S MALICIOUS FRAUD AND DISTORT.
About “additional balance and vestibular therapy,” I did not ask or argue
for it. I searched online. It involves with physical exercises. Physical
exertion, as simple as sitting-up, standing, walking, can exasperate my
symptoms. I don’t have the interest or strength for worsening. Additionally
, there was no prior “balance and vestibular therapy” requested by Dr.
Mehrdad Golzad’s office (New York City Medical & Neurological Offices) for
me, and there was no “physical therapy” authorized by any party to Dr.
Mehrdad Golzad’s office for me. Thus, the word, “additional,” is
meaningless and misleading. For a long time, I have talked about that my
craniocervical junction area must have been seriously injured to become
instable due to the fall, and I have asked Dr. Mehrdad Golzad directly or
his office Medical Assistants who saw me on the appointments to refer me to
a specific spine specialist (WCB-authorized) and a 2nd head-MRI. They didn’
t want to hear it or do it for me. Only on the most recent visit, on Nov. 26
, 2019, under my desperate request, another new MA seeing me at NYCMNO
provided a general referral to unspecified spine specialists and only
mentioned about my neck pain, as well as a referral of 2nd head-MRI at a
specified MRI facility.
Other medical providers do not even provide an appointment in the beginning
or for a follow-up or abruptly told me all future appointments have been
cancelled. When I did have appointments at other medical providers, their
service attitudes toward workers’ comp patients or generally patients were
generally not better. There might be long waiting hours beyond the
appointment time in the waiting area or an exam room. The seeing by an
assistant or a physician may be as short as a couple of minutes without
listening to my complaints of symptoms. My written statement of symptoms to
them could not bring much change. The attitude from front-desk, technicians,
nurses, assistants, to physicians may be times shunning, taunting, or
openly hostile. Some are covertly or overtly vicious to harm me more, or
even to ruin me to death. I have my native rights to my own views, life,
liberty and happiness too, though. That’s how largely how “no medical
evidence” originates, i.e., through no service or no recognition on medical
record, not because of “no medical symptoms” or “no medical need”.
Therefore, the medical “records” themselves already carry intrinsic
problems. Many of the claimed-having-done tests on medical “records” have
actually not been done. Many of the medical exams were actually very hasty
and brief. Many of the medical “records” exclude or distort my complaints
of symptoms. Many things, particularly “normal” findings, on the medical
“records” may be completely fabricated by medical providers. Some crucial
imaging services or evidences demonstrating the severe trauma to my head (
brain) and spine (spinal cord and nerves) were maliciously denied from my
access by various parties of this corrupt system. The diagnostic images of
my head and cervical spine were either blurry or incomplete from a 3.0 Tesla
MRI machine. The radiology facilities usually blame the blurriness on my
moving during the scans, but the reality is I didn’t voluntarily move or
didn’t sense I moved during the scans.
RSA Report was quoted by quotation marks and listed by rhombuses, and my
responses were led by arrowheads.
“REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS: The following documents were reviewed:
The EC-3 Employee Claim Form dated January 17, 2018, was read
describing the work-related accident; a fall from a ladder.
There are two EC-3’s. Sometimes, I reported neck and other body
sites in the injury, such as the spoken report to John the warehouse
supervisor on the date of injury Jan. 16, 2018 when I asked for early leave
that day; sometimes I did not. When asked by my former WC attorney Mr.
Matthew T. Swanson from BCF, my reported injury sites included neck and
other sides, which are shown on the attorney-modified version of EC-3 in the
eCase folder. The EC-3 form has limited spaces, and I was not experienced
about what’s important in such a case, and the pain sensation varies. For
such many reasons, my own EC-3 report on the next day didn’t include neck
as an injury site. Medical professionals would automatically or should
honestly include neck when they heard about my injury mechanism. And my
tetraplegia symptoms strongly indicate neck has been injured. And I have the
partial MRI evidences already. Why RSA changed “broken ladder” to “
Documents from Dr. Allan Beyda dated March 14, 2018, stated that
he fell from a ladder and had headaches and chest pain and was referred to
It’s about the Jan. 29, 2018 visit, so it should be stated by
RSA as “Documents from Dr. Allan Beyda dated Jan. 29, 2018”, instead of
the report date “March 14, 2018”. I strongly believe my opponents were
trying to foul play. Right before the Jan. 16, 2018 fall, I received a mail
from EmblemHealth Insurance, which falsely told me that my PCP then was Dr.
Charles Hwu, but Dr. Hwu was no longer in the network, and I had to change
my PCP. I followed the misinformation to change my PCP after the injuries.
Many odd things happened. No such doctor by such name, or no such doctor as
PCP, or no such doctor or clinic at the address, or such doctor on weeks-
long vacation, or online sought a phone # about such doctor led to a person
asking me whether I needed roadside rescue!!! Eventually, I changed to Dr.
Allan Beyda as PCP. Beyda office first offered me an appointment of Jan. 22,
2018, but later the same day, the earliest appointment provided was changed
to Jan. 29, 2018. It’s curious! My former WC attorney’s law firm BCF
multiple times avoided me about the Jan. 29, 2018 medical visit. My visit to
the referred neurologist also ended dramatically. I said my situation clear
for the appointment. After I filled in with my information on their
paperwork, I was then told by a physician-like white-coat that it’s a fraud
to use EmblemHealth for work injury. After the first WCB hearing on Mar. 12
, 2018, I went to Dr. Beyda office for a medical report, and Dr. Allan Beyda
instructed his staff to write such a two-line medical report. Later, I
learn by myself, such a report has no “objective” findings whatsoever at
all. Many times, I called Dr. Beyda’s office during normal workhours, the
phone would automatically claim the office was closed. A couple of times, I
went over and found it was actually open. I asked about the “objective”
findings. I was given a handwritten note copy. Later, I went thrice to ask
for handwriting interpretation, twice Dr. Allan Beyda read parts for me.
Some of his own writing seemed illegible to him. I found that medical note
must have been severely distorted and fabricated under influences. For
example, there was strong Babinski sign on my left foot as I vividly
remembered the big-toe heading up and the other four heading down and
fanning away. The sensation was extremely painful. I was complaining neck
flexion, not rotation, exacerbates the headache, but the medical note wrote
neck rotation worsens headache. My 2nd medical visit to Dr. Allan Beyda, on
Aug. 7th, 2019, was typical: long waiting in waiting area and in exam room,
then a nurse-like used a tool more likely to look into ears to reportedly
measure my body temperature, and took a while to get the body weight
measured right. No other thing. When Dr. Allan Beyda came in, I gave him the
photocopies of head and neck MRI reports and my Aug. 07, 2019 version
statement of the fall and recent symptoms. He was then only handwriting me a
referral note with a phone number and two doctors, refusing to add me the
patient’s name on the referral. That’s all. He claimed no charge for such
a visit, but his office charged EmblemHealth for it. I called the phone
number and visited the place on the referral. That clinic claimed there was
no Indemnity Insurance of North America as insurance, and claimed the phone
number of CCMSI didn’t work, and claimed my employer to be NYPD, etc, etc.
I gave up. When I called EmblemHealth whether they can authorize the spine
MRI, the CS said pre-authorized for three MRIs. Main Street Radiology never
wanted to talk about EmblemHealth with me, and only claimed the
authorization is required but not obtained, so I had to self-pay full and
sign their paperwork of threatening further payment. It’s a complicated
sick story too long to tell complete.
Complete Neurological Care report dated February 06, 2008, by Dr
. Larisa Simkhaev, states that he had headaches because of a fall from a
ladder at work. His physical examination was normal and his behavior was
unremarkable. There was no statement about a psychiatric examination but his
neurological examination was “muscle power full in all muscle groups. I
did not detect any atrophies or fasciculations. There was no tremor or
involuntary movements. Deep tendon reflexes were 2+ bilaterally. Plantar
reflexes were flexor. Muscle tone was normal.” Diagnoses included tension-
type headache, concussion without loss of consciousness and new daily
persistent headache. Treatment plan consisted of a trial of Pamelor 20 mg.
After the Jan. 16, 2018 fall at B.Q. Wide, I first had to learn
how to deal with such injuries. B.Q. Wide was only avoiding or misleading. I
then learned to find a WCB-authorized physician. However, so many calls to
the WCB website listed as authorized physicians found either phone# not
working, call not picked up, no such doctor at there, not accepting WC case,
not accepting WC anymore, needing a claim info and #, claim info not
working, etc. ONLY this Complete Neurological Care (CNC) offered an
appointment within ~two weeks to me on a WC case. MY FIRST VISIT TO THIS
COMPLETE NEUROLOGICAL CARE WAS ON FEBRUARY 06, 2018, ABSOLUTELY NOT 2008.
BASED ON MY INTERPRETATION, THE “February 06, 2008” IS AN INTENTIONAL,
FRAUDULENT DISTORTION BY DR. ROBERT S. SAMUEL OR HIS CONSPIRACY. THEY
INTENDED TO MESS UP THE TIMELINE TO FRAUDULENTLY PROJECTING A FALSE
IMPRESSION THAT I HAD HAD PRIOR NEUROLOGICAL VISITS. Only Dr. Ellen Edgar in
this clinic was listed as WCB-authorized, but at CNC I was questioned long
and examined briefly by a female white-coat later known as Dr. Larisa
Simkhaev. The clinic website’s list of physicians and nurses does not
include such a Dr. Larisa Simkhaev, and the medical report showed she was
not a physician or nurse. While WCB was sending me mails either claiming no
missed worktime or requiring medical evidence for the case, I asked CNC to
provide a medical report to WCB. CNC first said there was only medical notes
, but I insisted, whatever available. It appeared CNC’s faxing to WCB ran
into some problem, because WCB was answering me no medical record shown yet.
Eventually, two copies of the same version exist in WCB eCase folder. Once
again, Dr. RSA intentionally deleted the “broken” from “broken ladder”.
Perpetrators intentionally tampered that 8-ft stepladder to be broken for
almost exclusively my use, and forced me to use it. After the fall, the
perpetrators conspired further to lead me to this medical and legal dire
situation. While I appreciate the CNC’s lengthy and formatted report,
including a lengthy HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS section, many things claimed
normal in the CNC report were actually NOT tested at all. Why IME Dr. Robert
S. April intentionally left this out of his quotation, “MUSCULOSKELETAL:
musculoskeletal exam revealed normal ROM in the L-spine and C-spine with (+)
muscle spasms L-traps”? How Dr. RSA reaches his “objective” IMPRESSION
about my neck situation?
Dr. Harry Baum of Bay Ridge Orthopedic noted on February 13,
2018, that there was a left shoulder, left wrist, and left-hand derangement.
Recommendations were made for MRIs of the left shoulder, left hand and left
wrist and continuation of conservative treatment.
While I appreciate their accept of WC cases at Booth Medical
Services (Flushing, NY) once again, I was not seen by a physician here. I
was talking in English with them. The registration forms were not even
filled in by me. I was told to talk, and a nice-looking lady wrote up. When
coming to injured sites, I asked why she left some injured sites out, she
said no need to write everything up. I had a physical therapy there. NO
referral for MRI was given to me. My request for a referral to neurologist
was rudely rejected by another front-desk lady, who was only demanding me to
sign with their linked WC law firm first. No follow-up appointment was
offered. It’s either for me to go through such a managed business chain or
not. Their quickly available one-page medical report was signed with an
almost invisible line. HOW MUCH ACTUAL CHOICE OR FREEDOM A PERSON LIKE ME
Dr. Mehrdad Golzad report dated February 14, 2018, described his
decreased attention span, anxiety, depressed mood, blurred vision, and a
number of other subjective symptoms that were not mentioned before by other
providers. His motor examination was normal except for a wide-based gait
with a positive Romberg when standing tandem position. The diagnoses were
post-concussion syndrome and rule out traumatic brain injury. MRI of brain
with DTI, neuropsychological evaluation and Boswellia 1200 mg. for headaches
were recommended, and tests were ordered. A report of an x-ray of the
cervical spine dated February 15, 2018, from New York Medical & Diagnostic
Center, showed mild spondylitic changes. X-ray of the cervical spine dated
March 8, 2018, showed no fracture. X-ray of the wrist was normal. X-ray of
the left shoulder showed no bony abnormalities. A report of Alpha 3T MRI of
the brain done on February 15, 2018, showed increased white matter signals
but no other abnormality except for reduction of FA (fractional anisotropic).
Dr. ROBERT S. APRIL STARTED TO INTENTIONALLY MIX UP THE TWO
DIFFERENT CLINICS TOGETHER NOW, by mentioning the matters at New York
Medical & Diagnostic Center in the middle of the paragraph which starts and
ends with the matters at New York City Medical & Neurological Offices, PC.
Although the head MRI was done on a 3T machine, but the head images are all
blurry, grainy to me. The Alpha 3T blamed the low quality of images on my
movement during the MRI, but I knew I shouldn’t move during the MRI and I
didn’t move during the MRI. The first head MRI reported no intracranial
hemorrhage. The section of “A report of an x-ray…no body abnormalities”
was about two sets of x-ray imaging both ordered and done at New York
Medical & Diagnostic Center. The first set, two views of cervical spine, two
views of left shoulder, and two views of left wrist, was done on Feb. 15,
2018, by Dr. Martin Gillman, who gave me his business card showing as Martin
Stillman. I TOLD HIM HOW THE INJURY HAPPENED ON MY FIST VISIT, ON FEB. 15,
2018, TO THIS NYMDC CLINIC REFERRED AND TRANSFERRED TO BY MY FORMER WC
ATTORNEY LAW FIRM BCF. HE WAS THE ONE PERSUADING ME TO TAKE THE X-RAY THAT
DAY. I TOLD HIM I WOULD HAVE A HEAD MRI LATER IN THE AFTERNOON OF THE SAME
DAY AT MANHATTAN. RIGHT BEFORE THE X-RAY, SOMEHOW, SOMETHING LIKE DUST WAS
PUFFED AT MY FACE AREA WHILE DR. MARTIN GILLMAN WAS WALKING SLIGHTLY AHEAD
OF ME. IT SEEMED HE WAS PUTTING SOMETHING UNDER HIS ARMPIT. LATER, THE
LATERAL VIEW OF MY CERVICAL SPINE SHOWED A BRIGHT GRAIN LIKE A METAL FILING
INSIDE MY THROAT ON ITS SURFACE. THE MARCH 08, 2018 SET OF X-RAY ON MY
CERVICAL SPINE WAS PERFORMED BY A BLACK MAN AT NYMDC. THERE WERE LATERAL
VIEW (THREE POSITIONS, FLEXION, NEUTRAL, EXTENSION), AP VIEW, AND OPEN-MOUTH
VIEW. THE OPEN-MOUTH VIEW WAS TAKEN LAST, AND TAKEN TWICE, BECAUSE HE
LOOKED AT THE FIRST OPEN-MOUTH VIEW TAKE AND CLAIMED THAT I MOVED DURING THE
TAKE. LATER, WHEN I REPETIVELY ASKED FOR THE WHOLE SETS OF X-RAY IMAGES,
NYMDC KEPT EXCLUDING THE OPEN-MOUTH VIEW IMAGE, AND NYMDC EVEN CLAIMED OPEN-
MOUTH VIEW WAS FOR TEETH AND NYMDC DOES NOT EVEN PROVIDE OPEN-MOUTH VIEW X-
RAY IMAGING. I COMPLAINED TO NYS DEPART OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF MEDICAL
PROFESSIONAL CONDUCTS IN MARCH 2019 ABOUT THE OPEN-MOUTH VIEW IMAGE, AND I
ALSO NOTIFIED WCB ABOUT THIS ISSUE. OPMC STARTED TO INVESTIGATE ABOUT IT
ONLY SIX MONTHS LATER, AND SEEMED ONLY TO RUSH THROUGH TO END THE
INVESTIGATION. THE TWO SETS OF X-RAY WERE BOTH DONE BEFORE THE FIRST WCB
HEARING. THEIR X-RAY REPORTS WERE CLAIMING PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHING NORMAL
WHILE THE ORGINAL COMPLETE IMAGES ABSOLUTELY DEMONSTRATED SEVERE NECK
INJURIES, INCLUDING FRACTURE. ALONG WITH NUMEROUS OTHER EVIDENCE, I OUTCRY
THAT THIS IS A PREMEDITATED AND COORDINATED MURDER ATTEMPT TO MY LIFE. IT
STRETCHES DOWN FROM THE STATE-, DEEP-STATE-, LEVEL TO STREET VILLIANS, FROM
PRIOR TO THE JAN. 16, 2018 FALL TO THE AFTERMATH DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, AND
Report from New York Medical and Diagnostic Centre dated
February 16, 2018, by Dr. Benjamin Uh, reported injury to the neck, left
shoulder, left elbow and let wrist following the accident of record.
Treatment plan consisted of Voltaren, physical therapy and MRIs of the
cervical spine, left shoulder, left elbow and left wrist.
I appreciate the immediate medical appointment made available by
the managed business chain. DURING THIS FEB. 16, 2018 SEEING, DR. BENJAMIN
UH SAID TO ME THAT THE FEB. 15, 2018 X-RAY SHOWED NO PROBLEM, NO PROBLEM TO
MY CERVICAL SPINE EITHER. HE PRESCRIBED MRI FOR MY LEFT SHOULDER, LEFT ELBOW
, AND LEFT WRIST, ABSOLUTELY NOT FOR MY CERVICAL SPINE. DR. BENJAMIN UH’S
FEB. 16, 2018 MEDICAL REPORT IS AN IMPORTANT EVIDENCE ABOUT THIS CORRUPT
SYSTEM. HOW THE FIRST WCB HEARING DECISION ON THE MARCH 12, 2018 HEARING
REACHED THAT KIND OF DECISION ABOUT MY NECK AND LEFT ELBOW? NYMDC’S
BUSINESS-CONNECTED WITH NEIGHBORHOOD RADIOLOGY, WHY NEIGHBORHOOD RADIOLOGY
PUT UP SO MANY THINGS TO DENY OR DELAY THE MRI SERVICE OR DATA, PARTICULARLY
ABOUT MY CERVICAL SPINE?
Physical therapy progress notes from New York Medical and
Diagnostic from Kew Gardens are dated February 24 and 27, 2018 were noted.
IN WCB’S ECASE FOLDER, WHEN IS THE EARLIEST DATE ABOUT THE
PHYSICAL THERAPY AND CHIROPRACTIC THERAPY FROM NEW YORK MEDICAL AND
DIAGNOSTIC CENTER? TO MY RECOGNITION, DR. YAZAN RAJAI JABAJI, A CHIROPRACTOR
AT NYMDC, CARRIED OUT MALICIOUS AND POTENTIALLY FATAL SUDDEN ATTACKS VEILED
AS CHIROPRACTIC TREATMENT TO ME ON FEB. 17, 2018. DR. YAZAN RAJAI JABAJI
TOLD ME TO LIE DOWN ON MY BELLY, SUSPEND MY HEAD AND NECK OVER THE END OF
THE PHYSICAL THERAPY TABLE. WHILE HE WAS HOLDING MY CHIN AND TELLING ME TO
RELAX MY NECK, DR. YAZAN RAJAI JABAJI SUDDENLY ROTATED MY HEAD AND NECK TO
MY LEFT BY A VERY BIG ANGLE, PROBABLY A 90 DEGREE. I MADE AN IMMEDIATE
SCREAM, AND IMMEDIATELY TOLD HIM TO STOP SUCH TREATMENT NOW AND FOREVER ON
MY NECK. HE LEFT THE CLOTHED BOOTH, AND LATER CAME IN AND SUDDENLY THRUSTED
PROBABLY WITH HIS FULL FORCE ON MY BACK WHILE I WAS STILL LYING ON MY BELLY
ON THE PT TABLE. I IMMEDIATELY SCREAMED AGAIN AND IMMEDIATELY TOLD HIM TO
STOP THIS KIND OF CHIROPRACTIC TREATMENT ON MY BACK NOW AND FOREVER. THE
REQUEST OF MRI ON MY NECK AND LEFT HAND WAS MADE BY ME TO DR. YAZAN RAJAI
JABAJI ON FEB. 19, 2018, AND AFTER A WHILE, HE BROUGHT ME THE FILLED AND
SIGNED NEIGHBORHOOD RADIOLOGY FORM FOR MRI ON CERVICAL SPINE AND LEFT HAND.
Later, someday, I overheard a black male like voice from a neighboring booth
, which claimed to Dr. Yazan Rajai Jabaji that the cracking treatment helped
him feel better. On April 10, 2018, two days before the Apr. 12, 2018 MRI
on my cervical spine, physical therapist Aji Thariyan at NYMDC did the first
and only time forceful traction over my neck and head, and I told him to
stop such dangerous therapy, so he soon stopped. STRONG EVIDENCES SHOW THAT
THEY HAVE BEEN CONSPIRING THEIR CONTINOUS MURDER ATTEMPT ON ME, FROM THE
VERY BEGINNING OF DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT.
Initial neuropsychological screening on February 16, 2018 by Dr.
Flores-Arman, included complaints of headaches, blurry vision, pain in neck
, back, left hand, shoulder and arm as well as issues with his memory,
attention, anxiety and poor sleeping. A battery of tests was administered.
Results showed good effort and genuine test taking aptitude but that there
was decreased processing speed. This description of this claimant by this
neuropsychologist does not match at all the behaviors that I saw in my
office today. Dr. Flores-Arman recommended a brief trial of cognitive
The seeing of me by Dr. Flores-Arman does not match at all the
talks and behaviors of Dr. Robert S. April to me and about me, and that
should be an objective explanation of Dr. RSA’s statement, “This
description of this claimant by this neuropsychologist does not match at all
the behaviors that I saw in my office today.”
Dr. Golzad performed a normal EMG study and normal NCS on
February 28, 2018. He performed a normal VEMP study on March 5, 2018.
THIS IS ANOTHER INTENTIONAL MESS-UP AND COVER-UP BY DR. ROBERT S
. APRIL IN AN IME REPORT. THE NCS, VEMP OR ANYTHING LIKE, BUT NOT EMG, WERE
DONE BY AN OLD JEW TECHNICIAN AT NEW YORK MEDICAL & DIAGNOSTIC CENTER ON TWO
DAYS IN EARLY SPRING OF 2018. THE JEW PUT ELECTRODES ON MY HEAD TOO, AND
ELECTRICALLY SHOCK ME AT LEAST ONCE DURING THE FIRST TEST. I TOLD HIM I WAS
ELECTRICALLY SHOCKED AND ASKED HIM NOT TO DO SO. THE SECOND TEST HE WAS
ABOUT TO ELLECTRICALLY SHOCK ME AGAIN, AND I WATCHED EVREY BIT OF HIS ACTION
ANG CAUTIONED HIM ANG GUARDED MYSELF. ON JAN. 29, 2019, I HAD A FOLLOW-UP
VISIT TO THE NYMDC’S PAIN MANAGEMENT DR. NAIK APPASAHEB, WHO WAS WEIRDLY
LISTED AS A NEUROSURGEON AT THE NYS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION BOARD WEBSITE,
BUT DR. NAIK APPASAHEB THEN SIMPLY CLAIMED HE KNEW NOTHING ABOUT MY NECK
INJURY. THAT JAN. 29, 2019 VISIT HAD NO EXAM AT ALL, VERY LITTLE TALK, AND
THEN WAS DIRECTED TO THE OLD JEW AGAIN FOR EMG TEST. THE JEW THEN TURNED THE
MACHINE AND THE ELECTRODES TO ELECTRICALLY BUZZ IN THE AIR. I THEN PUT ON
MY CLOTHES AND BACKED OFF. LATER, NYMDC PRINTED OUT A MEDICAL REPORT OF THE
JAN. 29, 2019 VISIT WITH A LOT OF “INFORMATION”, A TYPICAL MEDICAL REPORT.
ANYWAY, IT MENTIONED RADIOCULOPATHY. NYMDC’S REPORTS OF SUCH TESTS BY THE
JEW CLAIMED EVERYTHING NORMAL, DISCLAIMED ANY RISK, DIDN’T REVEAL THE TEST
PERFORMER, AND WAS NOT SIGNED BY THE TEST PERFORMER. DR. MEHRDAD GOLZAD IS A
PHYSICIAN FROM A DIFFERENT CLINIC, HIS OWN CLINIC, NEW YORK CITY MEDICAL &
NEUROLOGICAL OFFICES, PC, AT QUITE A DIFFERENT PHYSICAL ADDRESS. DR. MEHRDAD
GOLZAD OR HIS NYCMNO CLINIC NEVER DID SUCH EMG, NCS, OR VEMP STUDIES ON ME.
Dr. Golzad’s computerized dynamic posturography of March 05,
2010, was seen along with electrodiagnostic evoked potential studies, all of
which were unnecessary in this case. He also reported auto acoustic
emissions and concluded that there was traumatic brain injury based on his
own testing of his video nystagmography, computerized dynamic posturography
and auto acoustic emission test. All of these examinations are beyond the
limits of what is considered standard neurological workup. Cognitive
remediation therapy was recommended.
There was a set of tests done by an Indian-looking technician at
Dr. Mehrdad Golzad’s NYCMNO clinic on March 05, 2018, NOT MARCH 05, 2010,
i.e. NOT PRIOR TO THE JAN. 16, 2018 INJURY. THIS TEST WAS ALSO LISTED AS
DONE ON JAN. 15, 2018 ON THE WCB ECASE FOLDER, I.E. PRIOR TO THE JAN. 16,
2018 INJURY. METICULOUSLY DISTORTED DATES OF SERVICE WOULD LATER PROBABLY BE
EXPLAINED, IF EVER QUESTIONED, AS A CARELESS MIS-READING OR TYPO. TIME AND
TIME AGAIN OF SUCH ERRORS ON SUCH SIMPLE FACTS AT LEAST CAN MAKE SERIOUS
PEOPLE TREAT SUCH IME DEDICAL REPORT AS COMPLETELY GARBAGE. DR. ROBERT S.
APRIL WAS EDUCATING IN HIS FIRST REPORT THAT CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY SHOULD
BE USED AS STANDARD HEAD TRAUMA DIAGNOSIS. TO MY UNDERSTANDING,
CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY IS PLAIN X-RAY IMAGING, NOT EVEN CT. What Dr. RSA
means “All of these examinations are beyond the limits of what is
considered standard neurological workup.”? Try to cheat on people who has
zero or little medical knowledge? Also, the technician was holding my
shoulder while performing the posture test. I felt severe head spinning at a
point during the set of tests. I asked for the primary data from NYCMNO,
but I didn’t get. The NYCMNO report to me about this test set claims almost
everything as normal, and claims “a normal study”.
Cognitive therapy progress note dated March 6, 2018 by Dr.
Flores-Arman was noted. Cognitive therapy notes dated March 20, 2018 by Dr.
Avraham Schweiger, of the same office, was noted. Additional notes dated
March 24, 2018 through October 10, 2018, were noted and done at the same
office. The cognitive therapy progress notes do not include the descriptions
of the unusual behaviors and though processes that were evident on my
I will largely pass over this today. Only to point out that Dr.
Flores-Arman, Dr. Avraham Schweiger, and Dr. Mehrdad Golzad are all from the
same clinic, New York City Medical & Neurological Offices, PC, at the same
physical address. “The unusual behaviors and though processes that were
evident” to Dr. Robert S. April were largely because of Dr. Robert S. April
and other personnel at that Park Avenue Medical Professionals clinic.
A March 08, 2018 x-ray of the cervical spine done at NY Medical
& Diagnostic Center was normal.
As mentioned on a previous bulletin point, NYMDC HID A CRUCIAL
OPEN-MOUTH VIEW X-RAY IMAGE ABOUT C0-C2, AND NYMDC LAUNDRIED THE REST IMAGES
AS NORMAL, WISHING ME THE VICTIM AND ANY OTHER HONEST AND SERIOUS PEOPLE
NEVER UNDERSTAND HOW TO INTERPRET X-RAY IMAGES. FOR THE SAME
IRRESPONSIBILITY, DR. ROBERT S. APRIL CREATED WAYS TO WRITE NOTHING DIRECTLY
ABOUT HIS OWN EVALUATION OF THE PRIMARY DIAGNOSTIC DATA, INSTEAD OF ONLY
Chiropractic treatment notes dated March 8- 20, 2018 from New
York Medical and Diagnostic Centre, were noted. Report dated March 15, 208
by Dr. Golzad recommended continued cognitive remediation therapy, magnesium
400 mg and EEG study. Dr. Golzad performed a normal prolonged EEG study on
March 15, 2018. Physical therapy reports dated March 20, 2018 through May 2,
2018 were noted and were done at the same facility.
ONCE AGAIN, DR. ROBERT S. APRIL DELIBERATELY MIXED UP THE TWO
DIFFERENT CLINICS TOGETHER, AND DELIBERATELY MESSED UP DATE AND CONTENT TOO.
SUCH FRAUDULENT ACTIONS PROBABLY ATTEMPT TO MASH UP THE CRIMINAL
RESPONSIBILITIES OF WHO DID WHAT AT WHEN. Dr. Golzad is from New York City
Medical & Neurological Offices, not from the New York Medical & Diagnostic
Center. The physical addresses of NYCMNO and NYMDC are very different.
Chiropractic treatment and physical therapy were all provided at NYMDC, not
at NYCMNO. THE ACTUAL CHIROPRACTIC “TREATMENT” AND PHYSICAL THERAPY AT
NYMDC STARTED ON FEBRUARY 17, 2018, AND WERE ABRUPTLY CANCELLED IN FRONT OF
MY FACE IN EARLY MAY 2018. NYMDC THEN FORCED ME TO TAKE MY FACIAL PICTURE
INTO THEIR COMPUTER AND EVEN CLAIMED THIS OFFENSE AS AGAINST INSURANCE FRAUD
. WHO IS FRAUD? AND WHY FOR ALL SO MANY TERRIBLE THINGS AT NYMDC? THE EEG
STUDY WAS PRECRIBED EARLY, BUT ABSOLUTELY NOT ON MARCH 15, 208, AND THEN
DONE ON MARCH 15, 2018 AT NYCMNO. THERE WAS FIORICET PRESCRIBED BY DR.
MEHRDAD GOLZAD ON MY MARCH 05, 2018 VISIT. THE FIORICET DELIVERED TO ME
UNEQUIVOCALLY CAUSED AT LEAST SEVERE EXTRA HEART PAIN. I REPORTED TO NYCMNO,
AND THEN TOLD ME TO STOP ON FIORICET. HOWEVER, IT’S SO ODD TO SEE FIORICET
WAS NOT REPORTEDLY PRESCRIBED ON THE MARCH 05, 2018 MEDICAL REPORT. AND
LATER THAT YEAR, ANOTHER MEDICAL ASSISTANT BY THE NAME OF RIVKY JAFFE WAS SO
HOSTILE EVEN AT HER FIRST SEEING OF ME, AND CLAIMED NO FIORICET WAS
PRESCRIBED BY NYCMNO TO ME. MANY MEDICATIONS PRESCRIBED DUE TO THE JAN. 16,
2018 INJURIES HAD SEVERE SIDE EFFECTS. THE PRESCRIBERS WOULD NOT EVEN
ACKNOWLEDGE THE SIDE EFFECTS, LEAVING ALONE SHARING THE CONSEQUENCES. FOR
EXAMPLE, GABAPENTIN PRESCRIBED ON SEPT. 17, 2019 PRESUMABLY FOR HEADACHE
CAUSED SEVERE EXTRA HEART PAIN, LIVER PAIN, AND BLOOD FLUSHING ON HEAD, NO
TREATING EFFECT TO HEADACHE AT ALL. THE ANOTHER NEW MA AT NYCMNO, WHICH I
TEND TO SUSPECT WHETHER SUCH NEW MA IS INSTALLED BY THE DENYING EMPLOYER/
INSURANCE. THE MA ACTED AS IF THERE SHOULDN’T BE SUCH SIDE EFFECTS. SOON I
RECEIVED A MAIL SEEMINGLY FROM THE EMPLOYER TRINET SOI TO TELL ME THAT
GABAPENTIN IS NOT IN THE FORMULARY ESTABLISHED BY NYS WCB EARLY 2019.
WHATEVER, THEY AUTHORIZED SUCH POTENTIALLY FATAL MEDICATION TO ME, OTHERWISE
, I WOULDN’T HAVE GOTTEN IT FROM WALGREENS.
Radiological studies were done at Neighborhood Radiology on
March 24, 2018. Report of MRI of the left elbow showed joint effusion.
Report of MRI of the left shoulder showed no gross labral tear. Report of
MRI of the left hand done on April 2, 2018, showed normal visualized
intrinsic muscles. Report of MRI of the cervical spine done on April 2, 2018
, showed straightening of the lordosis and a broad-based posterior disc
osteophyte on the cord and C4-5 central posterior disc herniation on the
cord changes at other levels as well.
Once again, even the date was not copied correctly by Dr. Robert
S. April. My first cervical spine MRI without contrast was done on April 12
, 2018, not April 2, 2018. Don’t believe such “objective” typos. Dr. RSA
’s further washing-down rendering of the already secondary-information
should not considered as information other than evidence of intentional
manipulation. New York Medical & Diagnostic Center made the MRIs referrals
on their business connected Neighborhood Radiology form in mid-Feb. 2018,
but Neighborhood Radiology generated many reasons to deny or delay the MRI
services, such as just retained WC attorney from BCF didn’t represent me,
no insurance, no response from insurance, no authorization from insurance,
MRI machine breaking down when I arrived already without receiving any
cancellation call, o
※ 来源:·WWW 未名空间站 网址：mitbbs.com 移动：在应用商店搜索未名空间·[FROM: 2604:2000:b808:]