当前在线人数15648
移民专栏首页 -> 落地生根 -> 文章
分享一个NSC 0317的EB1A case
作者:cincypig   来源版面:落地生根   发文时间: 2018年09月05日 19:43:26
Update: Sorry that no Chinese input with work PC

My background: Polymer Chemistry (PhD 2016)
Two research filed: 1: Biocompatible Polymer (for heparin mimicking, this is
my PhD thesis); 2. Materials for wastewater purification, including
photocatalysts and organic/inorganic absorbents.


DIY EB1A:

2017年9月:initial submission
Paper: 34 paper (12 first+corresponding author) + 1 book chapter;
Citation: 642 Web of Science; 675 Scopus; 798 google scholar;
Review: 40 paper
Recommendation letter: 7 independent (Australia, China, Belgium, US) + 1 (
PhD adviser)

2018年5月:publication 和review meet; RFE significant contribution

2018年8月13日: RFE to USCIS
Paper: 40 paper + 1 book chapter
citation: 1250 from Google Scholar
Recommendation letter: add 2 independent + 1 current employer (state to
offer permanent job position)

2018年8月24日:significant contribution meet (All three criteria meet)
Overall: Deny
Argument from 0317:
1: Peer review is a routine in the filed; not every peer reviewer enjoys
sustained national or international acclaim;
2. 34 paper, but not compare with others in your field;
3. 798 citation is from Thomas Reuters (WHAT????), USCIS also use Google
Scholar (My RFE is totally based on Google Scholar, and it is 1250 citation)
. You are not the first author of the highest citation paper.
4. Your work is original and major significant, but no guarantee "small
percentage"


详细arugment请看附件。

果然是杀手呀。直接忽视了RFE的内容,明明是用Google scholar呀!

请问
1. 这个appeal有多大希望,还是说直接重新提交?
2. 跟公司在协商申请EB1B, 如果appeal或者重新提交的话,会和EB1B冲突嘛?

谢谢!!


此主题相关图片如下:


此主题相关图片如下:


此主题相关图片如下:


此主题相关图片如下:

[快速返回]
以下是最近 20 条留言:
赞助链接
南京航空航天大学
www.dguolaw.com
未名交友
将您的链接放在这儿
Site Map - Contact Us - Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy
版权所有 - 未名空间(mitbbs.com)- since 1996