当前在线人数16305
首页 - 博客首页 - 美国医学教育博客 - 文章阅读 [博客首页] [首页]
pathdoctor: 也谈面试时的困难问题
作者:USMedEdu
发表时间:2007-11-04
更新时间:2007-11-04
浏览:1974次
评论:0篇
地址:75.
::: 栏目 :::
现代医学vs“中医”
社会、艺术与医学
住院/FELLOW单位
中外医学网站精选
国内外医学交流信息
生物医学人物
力刀美加医学教育专
临床见习/实习/义工
医学生理学诺贝尔奖
医生助理(PA)职业
医学书籍照片及图谱
社会与医学瞬间定格
医学典故/医史杂谈
USMLE复习和考试
申请和面试住院医生
住院医生生活和工作
FELLOWSHIP
医生就业、工作及生
医学科普及问题解答
美加医学院申请/MCA
中美医学临床教育比
医学新进展及新闻
社会医学伦理

发信人: pathdoctor (doctor), 信区: MedicalCareer
标 题: Re: 我来贡献一个我遇到的面试问题
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Nov 4 12:51:00 2007)

RE: 面试时一位内科PROGRAM DIRECTOR问了这样一个很不客气,甚至带有敌意按鬼子们的
话有OFFENSIVE味道的问题:“Many people with too much research background
tend to be lamb at clinical work?HOW DO YOU THINK?”


This depends on how you present yourself. My answer: it makes you a better
clinician. Why?

Research: make you think more scientifically, learn how to solve complicated
questions, learn how to present data more effectively. learn to how to write scientific paper, learn AMerican Culture in these years, communicate more
effectively, etc

In Western Countries, people want to know what you have learned from what you
did. If you present what you have differently, your weakness is your strength.
That is what I did when I applied for residency. I did my PHD in a 1.5 tier
university and no paper from PhD study when applying for residency. Just say how
many years research you did and how many papers published DOES NOT help you that
much (0bviously more paper the better) if everybody has papers. Nobody will do
the same thing in their whole life. Many PIs do research in totally different
areas from the area when they did their PHD. Research is training and thw way
how to approach and solve problems is more important.

Why the interviewer ask this question? I understand. I myself do not believe
one can do well in both basic science and clinical work unless your IQ is
twice as that of others.

It depends on what programs. Internal medicine: in many academic programs
people run basic research and see patients. I think patients shoule stay
away from them. In pathology: some people do basic science and then do
clinical work in a subspecialized area --> their diagnostic skills are
decreasing. Look at those big names in pathology, no famous diagnostic
pathologists do both basic research and clinical service.

Hope this helps.

--
※ 修改:·pathdoctor 於 Nov 4 12:56:36 2007 修改本文·[FROM: 70.243.]

[上一篇] [下一篇] [发表评论] [写信问候] [收藏] [举报] 
 
暂无评论
 
用户名: 密码:
发表评论
评论:
[返回顶部] [刷新]  [给USMedEdu写信]  [美国医学教育博客首页] [博客首页] [BBS 未名空间站]
 
Site Map - Contact Us - Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy

版权所有BBS 未名空间站(mitbbs.com) since 1996