当前在线人数12104
首页 - 分类讨论区 - 新闻中心 - 美国新闻版 -阅读文章
未名交友
[更多]
[更多]
文章阅读:Re: I1000 法庭记录
[同主题阅读] [版面: 美国新闻] [作者:Maybbs2011] , 2019年03月09日21:45:39
Maybbs2011
进入未名形象秀
我的博客
[上篇] [下篇] [同主题上篇] [同主题下篇]

发信人: Maybbs2011 (May), 信区: USANews
标  题: Re: I1000 法庭记录
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Mar  9 21:45:39 2019, 美东)

根据支持I-1000方自己发布的数据,I-200通过之后,亚裔公司通过妇女和少数民族公
司认
证的比例由之前的15%(1997) 上升为25.8% (2015 to date).

OMWBE issued a report on the economic impact of minority businesses as a
result of I-200, and data in the report showed that “current” percentage
of OMWBE certified Asian American firms increased from 15% in 1997, the year
before I-200 was passed, to 25.8%, Black American firms declined from 15.6%
to 12.2%, Hispanic firms increased from 9.2% to 9.7%. Why did the
percentage of certified Asian American and Hispanic firms increased after I-
200 became law?  Did preferential treatment hurt some minority firms? As
Chief Justice Roberts once said “The way to stop discrimination on the
basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.”

Ward Connerly先生在最新的采访中说,
“And those that are pushing this are a number of minority contractors who
saw their good thing taken away when our initiative I-200 passed in 1998.
They want to restore the preferences that they were getting. When I say ‘
minority contractors’ I’m really talking about black contractors, who were
getting fat contracts under the old racial quota system,” he says. ”

所以,亚裔/华人无论在教育,还是政府合同中都不是种族优惠的受益者。

【 在 ai1901 (笑看众生) 的大作中提到: 】
: 哈佛大学 AA 的问题是优惠黑人,结果变成排挤亚裔/华人,这是有证据的。
: 但在政府招标或提供资助的事情上,是优惠所有少数族裔,有没有证据显示又是黑人排
: 挤华人?如果没有证据,那么理论上华人是多元化政策的受益者 -- 除非有反证。
: 在聘雇上也是一样,如果没有证据,华人搞不好是多元化的受益者!
: 也就是说,反哈佛大学 AA 与反其他领域的多元化不是同样的东西!




--
※ 修改:·Maybbs2011 於 Mar  9 21:49:25 2019 修改本文·[FROM: 50.]
※ 来源:·WWW 未名空间站 网址:mitbbs.com 移动:在应用商店搜索未名空间·[FROM: 50.]

[上篇] [下篇] [同主题上篇] [同主题下篇]
[转寄] [转贴] [回信给作者] [修改文章] [删除文章] [同主题阅读] [从此处展开] [返回版面] [快速返回] [收藏] [举报]
 
回复文章
标题:
内 容:

未名交友
将您的链接放在这儿

友情链接


 

Site Map - Contact Us - Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy

版权所有,未名空间(mitbbs.com),since 1996